Skip to content
effecthub

Cleanup.pictures vs Stillgram

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Stillgram — $2.99/mo vs $5/mo for Cleanup.pictures
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Cleanup.pictures has one; not confirmed by us for Stillgram
Higher Trust score
Cleanup.pictures — 93 vs 75 for Stillgram
Best fit
Cleanup.pictures: one-off removal of a tourist, sign or timestamp from a photo · Stillgram: travellers shooting busy landmarks without data roaming

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactCleanup.picturesStillgram
CategoryInpainting & Object RemovalInpainting & Object Removal
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$5/mo$2.99/mo
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score93 / 10075 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIiOS
CompanyJasper AIStillgram
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

Cleanup.pictures

Still the fastest free object eraser on the open web when you need one photo cleaned and refuse to make an account. It has been frozen for years though, so anything at print resolution or in volume belongs in its own successor ClipDrop or in Photoshop's generative fill.

Pros

  • no signup or upload queue, usable within seconds of landing on the page
  • $3-5 a month is the cheapest unlimited-resolution inpainting subscription around
  • the inpainting model is documented as an API with samples for Node.js, SwiftUI and Kotlin

Cons

  • the site has not visibly changed since 2022 and still carries the pre-acquisition owner's copyright notice
  • one seat per subscription, with no team or shared billing option
  • output quality now trails newer generative-fill models on anything large
  • free exports are hard-capped at 720px, which is unusable for print

Stillgram

A narrow tool that does one thing genuinely well: crowds vanish from landmark photos without a round trip to anyone's server. The offline, on-device design is the real selling point for travel. The worry is maintenance — the App Store build has sat untouched since mid-2023.

Pros

  • Runs entirely on the iPhone Neural Engine — works offline and uploads nothing
  • Tap-to-keep control over which people stay in frame
  • Produces a short clip of the crowd disappearing, not just a still
  • Free tier is usable, if watermarked and capped at 1K

Cons

  • iOS only, with no web or Android version
  • App Store listing shows no update since June 2023
  • Free tier limits crowd removal to selfies and stamps a watermark
  • Pricing differs between the website and the App Store listing
  • No company entity or country published

Which one fits

Choose Cleanup.pictures if you need

  • one-off removal of a tourist, sign or timestamp from a photo
  • stripping logos or watermarks from images you already hold the rights to
  • real-estate and product shots that need depersonalising in seconds

Choose Stillgram if you need

  • travellers shooting busy landmarks without data roaming
  • people who want photos processed without cloud upload
  • quick crowd cleanup at capture time rather than in an editor later

Cleanup.pictures vs Stillgram: the questions people ask

Is Cleanup.pictures cheaper than Stillgram?

On published entry prices, Stillgram starts lower — $2.99/mo against $5/mo for Cleanup.pictures. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Cleanup.pictures or Stillgram have a free tier?

Both: Cleanup.pictures has a free tier, and Stillgram has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Cleanup.pictures or Stillgram?

Cleanup.pictures ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Stillgram is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

Browse all Inpainting & Object Removal →