Skip to content
effecthub

Chatbase vs Quikwit

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Only Quikwit (Chatbase has paid plans only)
Public API
Chatbase has one; not confirmed by us for Quikwit
Higher Trust score
Chatbase — 86 vs 71 for Quikwit
Best fit
Chatbase: SaaS and ecommerce teams deflecting repeat questions from existing documentation · Quikwit: clinics, salons, and home-service businesses wanting a website FAQ bot
Status
Both up at our last check (Oct 15, 2026)

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactChatbaseQuikwit
CategoryCustom GPTs & Bot BuildersAI Support Chatbots
Pricing modelPaidFreemium
Starts at$32/mo—
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score86 / 10071 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb
CompanyChatbaseOsnnova Ventures Pte. Ltd.
Launched20232025
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Chatbase

The fastest route from a folder of help docs to a working support widget, and priced accordingly once real traffic arrives. Credits are the whole story: 700 messages a month on Hobby ($40, or $32 billed yearly) is a small site's volume, and the plans that carry real traffic cost $150 and $500 a month. There is no free plan to fall back on, so budget from expected conversations, not from the feature grid.

Pros

  • Crawl-and-embed setup produces a usable widget in an afternoon with no retrieval plumbing to write
  • Actions and human handoff mean it degrades into a ticket rather than a dead end
  • Every paid plan carries a 7-day trial, and the yearly toggle takes 20% off

Cons

  • The free plan is gone, so evaluation is limited to a 7-day trial
  • API access is gated to Standard at $150/month ($120 billed yearly), several times the entry price
  • Overage at $40 per 1,000 credits is steep next to the in-plan rate on Pro
  • Each plan includes a single agent; more cost $300 per agent a year, and removing branding $1,188 a year

Quikwit

Quikwit targets small service businesses that want a chatbot for their website and messaging apps without hiring a developer. Setup looks straightforward and the free tier needs no card, but published information stops at getting started free — actual paid pricing and limits aren't public.

Pros

  • no-code setup aimed specifically at non-technical small businesses
  • deploys across a website plus WhatsApp and Telegram, not just one channel
  • free tier with no credit card required to start
  • targets vertical use cases like clinics and salons rather than staying generic

Cons

  • no plan prices, credit limits, or feature tiers are published on the site
  • no evidence of an API or deeper integrations beyond the listed chat channels

Which one fits

Choose Chatbase if you need

  • SaaS and ecommerce teams deflecting repeat questions from existing documentation
  • Solo founders who need a support presence before they can hire one
  • Agencies standing up a branded bot per client, provided each client funds its own agent slot

Choose Quikwit if you need

  • clinics, salons, and home-service businesses wanting a website FAQ bot
  • small teams that want WhatsApp or Telegram as a support channel
  • businesses that don't want to write chatbot flows in code

Chatbase vs Quikwit: the questions people ask

Is Chatbase cheaper than Quikwit?

Chatbase starts at $32/mo. Quikwit has a free tier; what its paid plans cost is not confirmed by us yet.

Does Chatbase or Quikwit have a free tier?

Quikwit has a free tier; Chatbase has paid plans only.

Which has a public API, Chatbase or Quikwit?

Chatbase ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Quikwit is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

Browse all Custom GPTs & Bot Builders →