Skip to content
effecthub

88Agents vs Chatbase

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper
88Agents — $22/mo vs $32/mo for Chatbase
Free plan
Neither — 88Agents has paid plans only, Chatbase has paid plans only
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Chatbase — 86 vs 81 for 88Agents
Best fit
88Agents: Agencies deploying chatbots for multiple clients · Chatbase: SaaS and ecommerce teams deflecting repeat questions from existing documentation

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

Fact88AgentsChatbase
CategoryCustom GPTs & Bot BuildersCustom GPTs & Bot Builders
Pricing modelPaidPaid
Starts at$22/mo$32/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score81 / 10086 / 100
PlatformsWeb, Slack app, APIWeb, API
CompanyTeleport Corp Pty LtdChatbase
Launched—2023
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

88Agents

88Agents is aimed at agencies and builders rather than a single company's support desk: the bring-your-own-model-key approach and multi-channel deployment make it flexible for reselling to clients. Plans scale by chatbot count and storage rather than by usage, so pricing can climb quickly for anyone running many small bots rather than a few large ones.

Pros

  • Deploys the same trained agent across web, Slack, email, WhatsApp, and SMS
  • Lets customers choose between OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini per agent instead of locking into one provider
  • Trains on documents, websites, databases, and video, not just text uploads

Cons

  • No free tier; entry plan starts at $22-29/month
  • Plan limits are based on chatbot count and storage rather than conversation volume, an awkward fit for one high-traffic bot
  • Bringing your own model keys means separate, uncapped LLM provider costs on top of the subscription

Chatbase

The fastest route from a folder of help docs to a working support widget, and priced accordingly once real traffic arrives. Credits are the whole story: 700 messages a month on Hobby ($40, or $32 billed yearly) is a small site's volume, and the plans that carry real traffic cost $150 and $500 a month. There is no free plan to fall back on, so budget from expected conversations, not from the feature grid.

Pros

  • Crawl-and-embed setup produces a usable widget in an afternoon with no retrieval plumbing to write
  • Actions and human handoff mean it degrades into a ticket rather than a dead end
  • Every paid plan carries a 7-day trial, and the yearly toggle takes 20% off

Cons

  • The free plan is gone, so evaluation is limited to a 7-day trial
  • API access is gated to Standard at $150/month ($120 billed yearly), several times the entry price
  • Overage at $40 per 1,000 credits is steep next to the in-plan rate on Pro
  • Each plan includes a single agent; more cost $300 per agent a year, and removing branding $1,188 a year

Which one fits

Choose 88Agents if you need

  • Agencies deploying chatbots for multiple clients
  • Builders who want to choose between OpenAI, Anthropic, or Gemini per agent
  • Teams needing one agent reachable across several messaging channels

Choose Chatbase if you need

  • SaaS and ecommerce teams deflecting repeat questions from existing documentation
  • Solo founders who need a support presence before they can hire one
  • Agencies standing up a branded bot per client, provided each client funds its own agent slot

88Agents vs Chatbase: the questions people ask

Is 88Agents cheaper than Chatbase?

On published entry prices, 88Agents starts lower — $22/mo against $32/mo for Chatbase. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Which has a public API, 88Agents or Chatbase?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

Browse all Custom GPTs & Bot Builders →