Skip to content
effecthub

Flowith vs Miro AI

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Flowith starts at $17.91, Miro AI at $8. Both have a free tier. Only Miro AI ships a public API.

FlowithCanvas workspace where AI agents run long multi-step tasksMiro AIAI layer inside Miro's whiteboard: agents that read the canvas, cluster stickies and run prebuilt playbooks.

Side by side

FactFlowithMiro AI
CategoryAI Agents & Autonomous WorkersDiagramming & Whiteboards
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$17.91 month$8 seat_month
Public APINoYes
PlatformsWebWeb, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, API
CompanyFlowithMiro
Launched20232011
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Flowith

The canvas is the actual product — if you routinely fork a conversation into three directions and lose track, this fixes that better than any chat UI. If you work linearly, you are paying credits for a layout you will not use.

Pros

  • Node canvas keeps branching work visible instead of buried in scrollback
  • NEO handles long-horizon tasks without step-by-step supervision
  • Multiple frontier models available under one credit pool
  • Free tier of 300 credits is enough to judge whether the canvas suits you

Cons

  • Credit consumption is hard to predict, especially on premium models
  • No public API, so it stays a personal workspace and does not automate systems
  • Corporate details are thin — no legal entity or registered address on the site
  • 'Unlimited' packs on the top tiers are subject to fair use and peak-time rate limiting

Miro AI

The reason Miro AI beats a bolted-on chat box is context: the canvas is the prompt, so clustering, summarising and drafting land back on the board where the team already works. The cost model is the catch — AI credits are small on every tier and reset monthly, so real use pushes you upward. If your team is not already in Miro, none of this justifies a switch.

Pros

  • Uses existing board content as context, not a blank prompt
  • Prebuilt Playbooks for planning, prototyping and research
  • 250+ integrations plus a developer platform and MCP server
  • Free tier still includes 10 AI credits a month

Cons

  • AI credits are tightly capped: 25 per member on the $8 tier
  • Enterprise requires a 30-member minimum
  • Only worth paying for if the team is already on Miro

Which one fits

Choose Flowith if you need

  • Researchers and analysts running several parallel lines of enquiry on one topic
  • Consultants assembling long deliverables from many intermediate steps
  • Users who want an autonomous agent to grind through a task unattended

Choose Miro AI if you need

  • teams that already run workshops in Miro
  • summarising and clustering sticky-note sessions
  • turning board content into briefs or PRDs

More comparisons

Browse all AI Agents & Autonomous Workers →