Miro AI vs MyMap.AI

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan: Both have one
Public API: Miro AI has one; not confirmed by us for MyMap.AI
Higher Trust score: Miro AI — 94 vs 70 for MyMap.AI
Best fit: Miro AI: teams that already run workshops in Miro · MyMap.AI: Turning a long article or research paper into a one-screen map
Platforms: Miro AI: Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android · MyMap.AI: Web

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Miro AIAI layer inside Miro's whiteboard: agents that read the canvas, cluster stickies and run prebuilt playbooks.

MyMap.AIChat prompts become editable mind maps and flowcharts

Side by side

Fact	Miro AI	MyMap.AI
Category	Diagramming & Whiteboards	Note-taking & Second Brain
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Starts at	$8/seat/mo	—
Public API	Yes	Not confirmed
Trust score	94 / 100	70 / 100
Platforms	Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, API	Web
Company	Miro	—
Launched	2011	—
Last verified	Oct 16, 2026	Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

Miro AI

The reason Miro AI beats a bolted-on chat box is context: the canvas is the prompt, so clustering, summarising and drafting land back on the board where the team already works. The cost model is the catch — AI credits are small on every tier and reset monthly, so real use pushes you upward. If your team is not already in Miro, none of this justifies a switch.

Pros

Uses existing board content as context, not a blank prompt
Prebuilt Playbooks for planning, prototyping and research
250+ integrations plus a developer platform and MCP server
Free tier still includes 10 AI credits a month

Cons

AI credits are tightly capped: 25 per member on the $8 tier
Enterprise requires a 30-member minimum
Only worth paying for if the team is already on Miro

MyMap.AI

A reasonable shortcut when you want structure out of a messy idea and cannot be bothered to drag boxes around. It is a thinking aid, not a diagramming tool: anything destined for a deck or a spec will need cleanup elsewhere.

Pros

Output is an editable node graph, not a static image, so you can keep working on it
Accepts URLs as input, which beats pasting long text into a chat box
Covers several diagram types (maps, flowcharts, timelines, SWOT) in one canvas

Cons

Aggressive bot protection blocks even basic verification, and there is no public company information
Auto-layout gets crowded fast on large maps
Free credits are small enough that serious use hits the paywall quickly
Published pricing across review sites is contradictory and visibly out of date

Which one fits

Choose Miro AI if you need

teams that already run workshops in Miro
summarising and clustering sticky-note sessions
turning board content into briefs or PRDs

Choose MyMap.AI if you need

Turning a long article or research paper into a one-screen map
Early brainstorming where the shape of the idea matters more than the styling
Students and educators building study maps from source material