Flowith
Verified Oct 16, 2026 ActiveCanvas workspace where AI agents run long multi-step tasks
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Freemium
- Paid options from
- $17.91/mo
- Billing
- Monthly
Credit-based: the free Starter plan gives 300 credits, while Pro ($17.91/mo billed yearly at $214.92, $19.90 month to month), Ultimate ($44.91/mo yearly) and Infinite ($399.92/mo yearly) give 20,000 to 500,000 monthly credits plus bundled image and video generations. Unlimited packs come only with annual Ultimate and Infinite.
Use tool ↗About Flowith
Flowith replaces the linear chat window with a canvas where each prompt becomes a node, so parallel branches of the same piece of work stay visible instead of scrolling away. Its NEO agent plans and executes long jobs on its own — research, drafting, assembling deliverables — while a knowledge store holds reusable source material. Usage draws on a monthly credit pool, and concurrency limits rise with the plan.
- Platforms
- Web · iOS
- API
- Not confirmed
- Last verified
- Oct 16, 2026
Verified sources
- Pricing page: Starter $0 with 300 credits; Pro $17.91/mo billed yearly at $214.92 ($19.90 monthly), 20,000 credits; Ultimate $44.91/mo ($49.90), 50,000 credits; Infinite $399.92/mo ($499.90), 500,000 credits (15 October 2026)flowith.io ↗
- Pricing page metadata: all plans include access to Flowith Web and Flowith iOS; app page titled 'Flowith AI - Your Agentic Workspace' (15 October 2026)flowith.io ↗
Is Flowith legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- TLS certificate
- Issued by Let's Encrypt, valid until Dec 19, 2026Seen in our own connection to the site on Oct 16, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 16, 2026The site answered
- On the market since
- 2023The vendor's own material, read by us
- Operated by
- FlowithOur research, card verified Oct 15, 2026
Pros & cons of Flowith
The canvas is the actual product — if you routinely fork a conversation into three directions and lose track, this fixes that better than any chat UI. If you work linearly, you are paying credits for a layout you will not use.
Pros
- Node canvas keeps branching work visible instead of buried in scrollback
- NEO handles long-horizon tasks without step-by-step supervision
- Multiple frontier models available under one credit pool
- Free tier of 300 credits is enough to judge whether the canvas suits you
Cons
- Credit consumption is hard to predict, especially on premium models
- No public API, so it stays a personal workspace and does not automate systems
- Corporate details are thin — no legal entity or registered address on the site
- 'Unlimited' packs on the top tiers are subject to fair use and peak-time rate limiting
Best for
- Researchers and analysts running several parallel lines of enquiry on one topic
- Consultants assembling long deliverables from many intermediate steps
- Users who want an autonomous agent to grind through a task unattended
Not for
- People who want one clean answer to one question — a normal chatbot is cheaper
- Developers who need to call the agent from their own code
Watch out: Advertised prices are the annual-billing figures; month-to-month costs roughly 10% more, and the free 300 credits are one-time rather than monthly.
Alternatives to Flowith
Flowith head-to-head
Side-by-side fact sheets against the competitors our research or their makers name — pricing, platforms, API and both verdicts on one page.