Skip to content
effecthub

Flowith vs Loopa

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Flowith starts at $17.91, Loopa at $17. Both have a free tier.

FlowithCanvas workspace where AI agents run long multi-step tasksLoopaGeneral-purpose agent that plans and runs multi-step tasks, returning slides, docs, sites or research.

Side by side

FactFlowithLoopa
CategoryAI Agents & Autonomous WorkersAI Agents & Autonomous Workers
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$17.91 month$17 month
Public APINoNo
PlatformsWebWeb
CompanyFlowith—
Launched2023—
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Flowith

The canvas is the actual product — if you routinely fork a conversation into three directions and lose track, this fixes that better than any chat UI. If you work linearly, you are paying credits for a layout you will not use.

Pros

  • Node canvas keeps branching work visible instead of buried in scrollback
  • NEO handles long-horizon tasks without step-by-step supervision
  • Multiple frontier models available under one credit pool
  • Free tier of 300 credits is enough to judge whether the canvas suits you

Cons

  • Credit consumption is hard to predict, especially on premium models
  • No public API, so it stays a personal workspace and does not automate systems
  • Corporate details are thin — no legal entity or registered address on the site
  • 'Unlimited' packs on the top tiers are subject to fair use and peak-time rate limiting

Loopa

Loopa is priced like a consumer subscription for something that behaves like an agent workbench: daily free credits, a cheap Pro tier, and output in the file formats people actually send. Multi-model routing and user-written skills give it more room than a single-model assistant. Against that: no company name, no API, and credits you cannot easily forecast.

Pros

  • Returns finished files: PPTX, PDF, DOCX, XLSX and HTML
  • Routes across Claude, GPT, Gemini, Qwen and DeepSeek
  • Telegram, Discord and email triggers
  • 600 free credits a day without paying

Cons

  • No legal entity or country disclosed anywhere on the site
  • No public API
  • Credits, not tasks, are the unit — cost per job is unpredictable

Which one fits

Choose Flowith if you need

  • Researchers and analysts running several parallel lines of enquiry on one topic
  • Consultants assembling long deliverables from many intermediate steps
  • Users who want an autonomous agent to grind through a task unattended

Choose Loopa if you need

  • one-off deliverables like decks, briefs or small sites
  • people who want scheduled, recurring agent runs
  • cheap experimentation across several model families

More comparisons

All Loopa alternatives →Browse all AI Agents & Autonomous Workers →