Agenta
Verified Oct 2, 2026 ActiveOpen-source shared workspace where teams build agents and automations through chat, with tracing, evals and versioned configs.
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Freemium
- Paid options from
- $29/mo
- Billing
- Monthly
Cloud Hobby is free (2 team members, 5,000 agent runs a month, 1-week trace retention). Pro is $29 per month with unlimited members and 10,000 runs, then $5 per additional 10,000; Business is $299 per month. Self-hosting the open-source edition is free, with custom Enterprise support.
Use tool ↗About Agenta
Agenta started as an open-source LLMOps platform for prompt management, evaluation and observability, and now presents itself as a workspace for building AI agents and automations. Teams describe a job in chat, then share the agent, give it instructions, skills, tools and persistent files, and run it on a schedule or when an app event fires. It connects to more than 1,000 integrations and MCP servers, supports human-approval rules for actions, and records traces, usage and version history. The code is MIT-licensed, so it can be self-hosted with Docker or used through the vendor's cloud.
- Platforms
- Web · API
- API
- Yes
- Last verified
- Oct 2, 2026
Verified sources
- Pricing: Hobby free, Pro $29 per month, Business $299 per month; open-source and enterprise self-hostingagenta.ai ↗
- Docs describe the shared agent workspace, integrations, approvals, tracing and version historydocs.agenta.ai ↗
- MIT-licensed open-source repositorygithub.com ↗
- Legal terms name Agentatech UG, registered in Berlin, Germanyagenta.ai ↗
Is Agenta legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- Last checked
- Oct 2, 2026The site answered
- On the market since
- 2023The vendor's own material, read by us
- Operated by
- Agentatech UG, GermanyOur research, card verified Oct 2, 2026
Pros & cons of Agenta
Agenta is in transition from an LLMOps tool to an agent workspace, which makes it interesting for teams that want shared agents with tracing and evaluation baked in, and open source underneath. If you only need prompt management and evals, check that the current product still fits that narrower job. The MIT licence and self-hosting option lower the lock-in risk.
Pros
- MIT-licensed core that can be self-hosted with Docker
- Free cloud tier plus a $29 Pro plan
- Human-approval controls for agent actions
- Tracing, usage and version history for every agent
Cons
- The product direction changed recently, so older tutorials may not match the interface
- Free cloud tier limits team members to two and trace retention to one week
- Runs beyond the included allowance are billed per 10,000
Best for
- Teams that want shared, scheduled AI agents with approvals and an audit trail
- Developers who need tracing, evals and versioned agent configuration in one open-source stack
- Companies wanting to self-host agents with their own models and credentials
Not for
- Users who only want a classic prompt playground and have not looked at the new agent focus
- People who want a plain chatbot with no setup or integrations
Watch out: Run limits are metered (5,000 on Hobby, 10,000 on Pro and Business, then $5 per extra 10,000), and Hobby traces are kept for only one week, so debugging older failures needs a paid plan or self-hosting.
Top alternatives to Agenta
Agenta head-to-head
Side-by-side fact sheets against the competitors our research or their makers name — pricing, platforms, API and both verdicts on one page.