Skip to content
effecthub

Cursor vs MySpec

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Cursor publishes a starting price ($20); MySpec does not. Both have a free tier.

CursorAI-first code editor whose agents edit multi-file projects, run in the cloud and review pull requestsMySpecInterviews you about a feature, then writes constitution, requirements, solution and task files

Side by side

FactCursorMySpec
CategoryAI Code Editors & IDEsDocumentation Generators
Pricing modelFreemiumFree
Starts at$20 month—
Public APINoNo
PlatformsmacOS, Windows, Linux, WebWeb
CompanyAnysphere, Inc.—
Launched2023—
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Cursor

The default choice for developers who want agentic coding inside a real editor, with cloud agents, PR review and multi-model access that large engineering orgs have already standardized on. The catch is the bill: agent-heavy use runs past plan allowances and overages are billed in arrears, so costs need active monitoring.

Pros

  • Agents work with repository-wide context, in-editor and in the cloud
  • Multi-model access includes frontier models plus in-house Composer
  • Free Hobby tier exists for trying agent workflows
  • Widely adopted in large enterprises, so tooling and docs mature fast

Cons

  • Real monthly cost is elastic once usage-based pricing kicks in
  • Pro+ and Ultra pricing is shown only through a plan selector, hurting comparability
  • Proprietary editor lock-in versus plain VS Code with extensions

MySpec

Spec-driven development is the current answer to agents that build the wrong thing confidently, and MySpec is a clean implementation of it: a real interview, four files with distinct jobs, and testable EARS+ requirements instead of prose. The MCP server matters — the spec lands where the agent already works. It is an unlimited free beta right now, which also means the pricing you eventually pay is unknown.

Pros

  • Four distinct output files rather than one blob, each with a defined job
  • Requirements use the testable EARS+ when/if/then format instead of prose
  • Brownfield mode reads an existing codebase and scopes the change rather than restating the whole system
  • MCP server connects it to Claude Code, Cursor and Claude Desktop
  • Live Mermaid rendering for flowcharts, ER and sequence diagrams

Cons

  • Open beta, so nothing about stability, support or eventual price is settled
  • No company name, country or team disclosed anywhere on the site
  • The interview adds real time before any code gets written
  • Announced Pro and Team tiers have no published figures

Which one fits

Choose Cursor if you need

  • Professional developers running agents on large existing codebases
  • Teams that want code review, cloud agents and editor in one subscription
  • VS Code users wanting a familiar editor with deeper AI integration

Choose MySpec if you need

  • Developers using Claude Code, Cursor or similar who want a spec before generation
  • Teams adding a feature to an existing codebase and needing a scoped delta
  • Anyone tired of agents inventing requirements mid-build

More comparisons

All MySpec alternatives →Browse all AI Code Editors & IDEs →