Skip to content
effecthub

Cursor vs Google Antigravity

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price
Cursor from $20/mo, Google Antigravity from $30/seat/mo — different billing units, so no direct winner
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Google Antigravity has one; not confirmed by us for Cursor
Higher Trust score
Cursor — 94 vs 86 for Google Antigravity
Best fit
Cursor: Professional developers running agents on large existing codebases · Google Antigravity: Former Gemini CLI users who need a supported terminal agent

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactCursorGoogle Antigravity
CategoryAI Code Editors & IDEsAI Code Editors & IDEs
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$20/mo$30/seat/mo
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score94 / 10086 / 100
PlatformsmacOS, Windows, Linux, WebmacOS, Windows, Linux, API
CompanyAnysphere, Inc.Google LLC
Launched20232025
Last verifiedSep 29, 2026Oct 2, 2026

What our research says

Cursor

The default choice for developers who want agentic coding inside a real editor, with cloud agents, PR review and multi-model access that large engineering orgs have already standardized on. The catch is the bill: agent-heavy use runs past plan allowances and overages are billed in arrears, so costs need active monitoring.

Pros

  • Agents work with repository-wide context, in-editor and in the cloud
  • Multi-model access includes frontier models plus in-house Composer
  • Free Hobby tier exists for trying agent workflows
  • Widely adopted in large enterprises, so tooling and docs mature fast

Cons

  • Real monthly cost is elastic once usage-based pricing kicks in
  • Pro+ and Ultra pricing is shown only through a plan selector, hurting comparability
  • Proprietary editor lock-in versus plain VS Code with extensions

Google Antigravity

Worth trying for developers who want Google's own agent stack across a desktop manager, terminal and IDE, especially anyone who relied on Gemini CLI and has to move. The free tier is enough to evaluate it, but heavy daily use points to a Google AI or enterprise plan. Teams standardized on another vendor's agent have little reason to switch yet.

Pros

  • Free individual tier that includes the CLI and the IDE
  • Four surfaces share one agent harness: desktop app, CLI, SDK and IDE
  • Business route through Google Cloud with spend caps and admin controls
  • Python SDK for building custom agents

Cons

  • Free tier uses weekly rate limits that are not quantified
  • Pro and Ultra pricing is not shown on the Antigravity site
  • Gemini CLI users were given a short migration window when it was retired

Which one fits

Choose Cursor if you need

  • Professional developers running agents on large existing codebases
  • Teams that want code review, cloud agents and editor in one subscription
  • VS Code users wanting a familiar editor with deeper AI integration

Choose Google Antigravity if you need

  • Former Gemini CLI users who need a supported terminal agent
  • Developers who want to run several agents in parallel from one desktop app

Cursor vs Google Antigravity: the questions people ask

Is Cursor cheaper than Google Antigravity?

They charge in different units, so there is no like-for-like answer: Cursor starts at $20/mo, Google Antigravity at $30/seat/mo. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it.

Does Cursor or Google Antigravity have a free tier?

Both: Cursor has a free tier, and Google Antigravity has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Cursor or Google Antigravity?

Google Antigravity ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Cursor is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All Cursor alternatives →All Google Antigravity alternatives →Browse all AI Code Editors & IDEs →