Skip to content
effecthub

Avoma vs Ting AI

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Status
Ting AI failed our last uptime check (Oct 15, 2026); Avoma was up on Oct 15, 2026
Entry price
The same for both — $19/seat/mo
Free plan
Neither — Avoma has paid plans only, Ting AI has paid plans only
Public API
Avoma has one; not confirmed by us for Ting AI
Higher Trust score
Avoma — 92 vs 41 for Ting AI

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

AvomaRecords and transcribes sales meetings, then writes structured notes back to the CRMTing AIAuto-generates sales call follow-ups, CRM updates, and summaries for B2B reps.

Side by side

FactAvomaTing AI
CategoryMeeting AssistantsConversation Intelligence
Pricing modelPaidPaid
Starts at$19/seat/mo$19/seat/mo
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score92 / 10041 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb
CompanyAvoma—
Launched2017—
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Avoma

Avoma covers more of the revenue stack than a plain meeting recorder, taking a call from scheduling through transcription and coaching into forecasting. The catch is modular pricing: the advertised seat price buys only the meeting assistant, and the intelligence modules that justify the platform are billed separately.

Pros

  • Scheduling, recording, notes and CRM write-back in one subscription
  • Free viewer and collaborator seats keep non-recording colleagues off the bill
  • API and webhooks for exporting meeting data
  • In market since late 2017, with HIPAA compliance available on Enterprise

Cons

  • Conversation and revenue intelligence are extra per-seat add-ons
  • Startup tier caps at 25 paid seats, forcing an upgrade as teams grow
  • Enterprise requires a 10-seat minimum on annual billing

Ting AI

Ting AI is built for B2B reps who want the post-call admin — summaries, CRM updates, follow-ups — handled automatically instead of done by hand after every meeting. It's a fit for teams already living in a CRM; per-seat pricing adds up quickly for larger teams since no flat team rate is visible.

Pros

  • Auto-drafts follow-ups so reps aren't writing them from scratch
  • Writes call summaries and pushes updates into the CRM directly
  • Claims support across 102 languages for global sales teams
  • Gives reps individualized feedback on their call technique

Cons

  • Direct access to the site was blocked during this review, so some details rely on secondary sources
  • Per-seat pricing has no visible team or volume discount

Which one fits

Choose Avoma if you need

  • Sales teams that want call notes landing in the CRM automatically
  • Managers who need call scoring and coaching rather than just recordings
  • Customer-success groups tracking account health from meeting content

Choose Ting AI if you need

  • B2B sales reps who want automatic CRM updates after calls
  • Globally distributed teams needing multilingual call handling
  • Managers who want consistent call summaries across a team

Avoma vs Ting AI: the questions people ask

Is Avoma cheaper than Ting AI?

Both publish the same entry price, $19/seat/mo. The difference is what each plan includes, which the fact table above sets side by side.

Which has a public API, Avoma or Ting AI?

Avoma ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Ting AI is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

More comparisons

All Avoma alternatives →Browse all Meeting Assistants →