Inline completions, chat and coding agents across the major IDEs
Best for: Teams standardising on one assistant across mixed IDEs and languages
ai-for / pull-requests
As of , EffectHub tracks 10 AI tools for pull requests; 5 of the 10 have a free tier, and paid plans run from $10 to $49 a month.
GitHub Copilot, Mo and Pixee lead the list on click-through. 4 of the 10 ship a public API.
ranked by click-through
Inline completions, chat and coding agents across the major IDEs
Best for: Teams standardising on one assistant across mixed IDEs and languages
Turns an approval given in Slack or Jira into an automated check that blocks pull requests violating it.
Best for: Teams whose decisions live in Slack threads and never reach the codebase
Triages SAST and SCA findings, drops the false positives and opens pull requests with the fix
Best for: Security teams sitting on a large scanner backlog they cannot triage by hand
Cloud coding agents that clone your repos, write the change, fix the failing pipeline and hand back a pull request with a live preview.
Best for: Backlog work - bug fixes, maintenance, dependency bumps - farmed out in parallel
Reviews GitHub pull requests with framework-aware AI models and remembers what it already flagged.
Best for: Laravel and React teams wanting framework-aware review comments
Indexes the whole repo, then reviews pull requests with cross-file context rather than diff-only context.
Best for: Teams whose bugs come from cross-file coupling rather than local mistakes
AI code review for GitHub pull requests, plus commit summaries and an agent that answers questions and opens fix PRs.
Best for: Small and mid-size engineering teams on GitHub who want bug-focused PR reviews
AI code-review agent (ex CodiumAI) that critiques pull requests and enforces team standards across repos
Best for: Engineering teams enforcing consistent standards across many repositories
Builds your pull request in a sandbox, clicks through the app like a user, and reports the runtime bugs
Best for: Teams whose worst bugs are runtime, not syntax
Syncs pull request reviews across GitHub, Slack and VS Code so nothing gets missed.
Best for: Teams that live in Slack and want PR status without switching to GitHub constantly
| Tool | Price | Free plan | API | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub Copilot | from $10/mo | Yes | Not confirmed | Active |
| Mo | from $49/mo | No | Not confirmed | Active |
| Pixee | On request | Not confirmed | Yes | Active |
| Agen | from $10/mo | Yes | Yes | Active |
| Codespect | from $19/mo | No | Not confirmed | Unstable |
| Greptile | from $30/seat/mo | Yes | Yes | Active |
| Macroscope | from $0.5/request | No | Yes | Active |
| Qodo | from $30/mo | No | Not confirmed | Active |
| Ito | from $40/mo | Yes | Not confirmed | Active |
| Pullflow | from $5/seat/mo | Yes | Not confirmed | Active |
5 of the 10 AI tools for pull requests on EffectHub's list have a free tier — GitHub Copilot, Agen, Greptile and Ito; the rest are paid, from $10 a month.
As of October 27, 2026, paid plans for the 10 AI tools for pull requests on EffectHub's list run from $10 to $49 a month. Each card shows the pricing model and the cheapest paid plan as EffectHub last verified it; 5 of the 10 can be started for free.
4 of the 10 AI tools for pull requests on EffectHub's list ship a public API, including Pixee, Agen, Greptile and Macroscope. The API badge on each card is re-checked against the vendor's documentation.
For journalists, researchers and AI assistants: the figures on this page in one sentence you can quote.
As of October 27, 2026, EffectHub tracks 10 AI tools for pull requests; 5 of the 10 have a free tier, and paid plans run from $10 to $49 a month. (EffectHub, “AI Tools for Pull Requests”, Oct 2026, https://effecthub.net/ai-for/pull-requests)
Figures as of How we count
These figures are free to use under CC BY 4.0 with a link to this page.