Mo
Verified Oct 16, 2026 ActiveTurns an approval given in Slack or Jira into an automated check that blocks pull requests violating it.
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Paid
- Paid options from
- $49/mo
- Billing
- Monthly
$49 per project per month for the whole team (no seats), covering up to 20 approved decisions and 100 PR checks a month on the pricing page; more volume is by contact, and extra portal collaborators are $9 per month each. The pricing page offers a 7-day no-card trial, while the home page still says 14 days with 100 decisions and 300 checks.
Use tool ↗About Mo
Mo, made by Motionode, turns decisions a team agrees on in chat or tickets into checks run against later code changes. Someone approves a rule by mentioning Mo in Slack, Teams, Jira, Linear, Azure DevOps, Asana, Monday or Basecamp, or uploads a PDF or spec for it to extract rules from; Mo stores each rule linked to its source and checks every pull or merge request on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket against it, pointing at the line that conflicts. Typical rules cover pricing logic, permissions, onboarding steps and compliance guards. Billing is a flat fee per project rather than per seat.
- Platforms
- Web · Slack app
- API
- Not confirmed
- Last verified
- Oct 16, 2026
Verified sources
- Project plan at $49 per month per project with the entire team included, up to 20 approved decisions and 100 PR checks a month, a 7-day no-card trial and a $9 per month portal collaborator add-on, on the pricing page (15 October 2026)hey-mo.io ↗
- Home page lists Slack, Teams, Jira, Linear, Azure DevOps, Asana, Monday and Basecamp as decision sources and GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket as code hosts, still quotes a 14-day trial with 100 decisions and 300 checks, and the footer reads Motionode, Inc. (15 October 2026)hey-mo.io ↗
Is Mo legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- TLS certificate
- Issued by Let's Encrypt, valid until Dec 30, 2026Seen in our own connection to the site on Oct 16, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 16, 2026The site answered
- Operated by
- Motionode, Inc., United StatesOur research, card verified Oct 15, 2026
Pros & cons of Mo
Most code review tools look for bugs; Mo looks for a change that contradicts something a human already decided. That is a narrow but real failure mode — the pricing rule agreed in a thread six months ago that nobody encoded anywhere. Whether it works depends entirely on how well it maps prose decisions onto code, which no trial-free evaluation can tell you.
Pros
- Approvals captured in place across Slack, Teams, Jira, Linear, Asana, Monday, Azure DevOps and Basecamp
- Checks run on GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket pull and merge requests
- Traces each check back to the decision and the person who approved it
- Free trial with no card required
- Flat per-project price with the whole team included, no seat fees
Cons
- $49 per project per month with a cap of 20 approved decisions and 100 PR checks on the pricing page
- Effectiveness rests on translating prose approvals into code checks, which is hard to verify before trialling
- No public API found
- No launch year or customer references published
Best for
- Teams whose decisions live in Slack threads and never reach the codebase
- Guarding pricing, permission and compliance rules across releases
- Regulated work needing an audit trail from decision to merge
Not for
- Teams wanting general bug-finding code review
- Busy repositories expecting hundreds of PR checks a month on the base plan
Watch out: The vendor's own pages disagree: the pricing page lists a 7-day trial with 20 decisions and 100 PR checks a month, the home page a 14-day trial with 100 decisions and 300 checks, so confirm the allowance before relying on it.
Alternatives to Mo
Mo head-to-head
Side-by-side fact sheets against the competitors our research or their makers name — pricing, platforms, API and both verdicts on one page.
Also used for
AI tools by profession
Code Review & Quality is one of the jobs on this page: