Skip to content
effecthub

Greptile vs Qodo

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price
Greptile from $30/seat/mo, Qodo from $30/mo — different billing units, so no direct winner
Free plan
Only Greptile (Qodo has paid plans only)
Public API
Greptile has one; not confirmed by us for Qodo
Best fit
Greptile: Teams whose bugs come from cross-file coupling rather than local mistakes · Qodo: Engineering teams enforcing consistent standards across many repositories
Platforms
Greptile: Web · Qodo: Web, VS Code extension

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

GreptileIndexes the whole repo, then reviews pull requests with cross-file context rather than diff-only context.QodoAI code-review agent (ex CodiumAI) that critiques pull requests and enforces team standards across repos

Side by side

FactGreptileQodo
CategoryCode Review & QualityCode Review & Quality
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starts at$30/seat/mo$30/mo
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score85 / 10087 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, VS Code extension
CompanyTabnam, Inc.Qodo
Launched20232022
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

Greptile

The full-repo index is the difference that matters - it flags cross-file breakage that diff-only reviewers miss entirely. Billing only for developers who actually got a review that month is a fairer meter than flat per-seat. The 50 credits per seat go quickly on an active team, and $1 per extra review is where the real bill forms.

Pros

  • Indexes the whole codebase, so reviews carry cross-file context
  • Learns from the PR comments your team already writes
  • Seats bill only for developers who actually received a review that period
  • GitHub and GitLab plus an MCP server, an API and a self-hosting option

Cons

  • Credit model means an active repo will exceed the 50 included reviews per seat
  • Overage at $1 per review adds up quietly on a busy month
  • Free tier is capped at a single active developer

Qodo

Strong fit for teams drowning in AI-generated pull requests who want reviews that apply house rules with context from other repositories, not just generic lint. The catch is credit-metered pricing where a heavy month of reviews can outrun the pack you bought, and the CodiumAI-era test-generation identity has been deprioritized.

Pros

  • Reviews use cross-repo context and learned team rules rather than file-local checks
  • Trial is 14 days with unlimited reviews, easy to evaluate honestly
  • Covers IDE, Git platform and governance dashboard in one product
  • Free program for qualifying open-source projects

Cons

  • Credit metering (~$0.012/credit) makes monthly cost usage-dependent
  • No permanent free tier anymore
  • Public API is not documented; automation runs through its own integrations

Which one fits

Choose Greptile if you need

  • Teams whose bugs come from cross-file coupling rather than local mistakes
  • Enforcing repo-specific conventions through custom rules
  • Orgs that need self-hosted review for code that cannot leave their network

Choose Qodo if you need

  • Engineering teams enforcing consistent standards across many repositories
  • Organizations governing how AI coding agents merge code
  • Teams on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket or Azure DevOps wanting automated PR review

Greptile vs Qodo: the questions people ask

Is Greptile cheaper than Qodo?

They charge in different units, so there is no like-for-like answer: Greptile starts at $30/seat/mo, Qodo at $30/mo. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it.

Does Greptile or Qodo have a free tier?

Greptile has a free tier; Qodo has paid plans only.

Which has a public API, Greptile or Qodo?

Greptile ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Qodo is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

More comparisons

Browse all Code Review & Quality →