Skip to content
effecthub

Greptile vs Ito

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price
Greptile from $30/seat/mo, Ito from $40/mo — different billing units, so no direct winner
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Greptile has one; not confirmed by us for Ito
Best fit
Greptile: Teams whose bugs come from cross-file coupling rather than local mistakes · Ito: Teams whose worst bugs are runtime, not syntax
Trust score
About even — Greptile 85, Ito 85

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

GreptileIndexes the whole repo, then reviews pull requests with cross-file context rather than diff-only context.ItoBuilds your pull request in a sandbox, clicks through the app like a user, and reports the runtime bugs

Side by side

FactGreptileIto
CategoryCode Review & QualityCode Review & Quality
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$30/seat/mo$40/mo
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score85 / 10085 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb
CompanyTabnam, Inc.Ito
Launched2023—
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Greptile

The full-repo index is the difference that matters - it flags cross-file breakage that diff-only reviewers miss entirely. Billing only for developers who actually got a review that month is a fairer meter than flat per-seat. The 50 credits per seat go quickly on an active team, and $1 per extra review is where the real bill forms.

Pros

  • Indexes the whole codebase, so reviews carry cross-file context
  • Learns from the PR comments your team already writes
  • Seats bill only for developers who actually received a review that period
  • GitHub and GitLab plus an MCP server, an API and a self-hosting option

Cons

  • Credit model means an active repo will exceed the 50 included reviews per seat
  • Overage at $1 per review adds up quietly on a busy month
  • Free tier is capped at a single active developer

Ito

Most AI reviewers argue about the diff; Ito actually runs the branch and tells you what broke, which catches the class of bug static analysis never sees. The trade is cost and scope: $40 buys 20 reviews a month per seat, and every review after that is metered, so a busy repository adds up quickly.

Pros

  • Boots the app in a sandbox and exercises user flows instead of only reading the diff
  • Attaches video, screenshots and logs so each failure arrives with a reproduction
  • Framework-agnostic, with React, Vue, Next.js, Rails and Django named on the site
  • Free plan for MIT/Apache open-source repos, plus 100 free reviews to trial it

Cons

  • Only 20 reviews per seat are included; extras cost $3 apiece
  • No company name, address or country published anywhere on the site
  • Nothing on the site about self-hosting or a programmatic API

Which one fits

Choose Greptile if you need

  • Teams whose bugs come from cross-file coupling rather than local mistakes
  • Enforcing repo-specific conventions through custom rules
  • Orgs that need self-hosted review for code that cannot leave their network

Choose Ito if you need

  • Teams whose worst bugs are runtime, not syntax
  • Web apps with real user flows worth exercising on every pull request
  • Open-source maintainers, who qualify for the free tier

Greptile vs Ito: the questions people ask

Is Greptile cheaper than Ito?

They charge in different units, so there is no like-for-like answer: Greptile starts at $30/seat/mo, Ito at $40/mo. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it.

Does Greptile or Ito have a free tier?

Both: Greptile has a free tier, and Ito has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Greptile or Ito?

Greptile ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Ito is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

More comparisons

Browse all Code Review & Quality →