Skip to content
effecthub

Uizard vs UXMagic AI

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Uizard — $12/mo vs $35/mo for UXMagic AI
Free plan
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Uizard — 92 vs 85 for UXMagic AI
Best fit
Uizard: Product managers sketching a concept before involving designers · UXMagic AI: Designers who want a fast first draft of a screen from a sketch, prompt, or existing site
Platforms
Uizard: Web · UXMagic AI: Web, Figma plugin

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactUizardUXMagic AI
CategoryUI/UX Design & PrototypingUI/UX Design & Prototyping
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$12/mo$35/mo
Trust score92 / 10085 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb, Figma plugin
CompanyUizardApp ApSUXMagic AI Technologies Inc.
Launched2018—
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Uizard

Good for getting a rough multi-screen concept in front of stakeholders within an hour; not where the real design work ends up living afterwards.

Pros

  • Output is editable components, not a flat image you have to redraw
  • Sketch and screenshot import genuinely shortens the blank-page stage
  • $12/mo entry is cheap next to mainstream design tools
  • Free tier is enough to judge whether the fidelity suits your work

Cons

  • Miro acquired it in 2024, so long-term roadmap independence is unclear
  • The free plan's 3 generations a month runs out almost immediately
  • Fidelity sits below what a designer would ship; expect to rebuild elsewhere
  • Headline prices are annual-billed, so month-to-month buyers pay more

UXMagic AI

UXMagic's range of inputs — prompt, sketch, screenshot, or a URL to clone — covers most of the ways a designer might want to start a screen, and shipping straight to editable Figma layers instead of a flattened image is what makes it usable inside a real design workflow. The design-system import keeps output consistent with a brand's existing components, but like any generative tool it still needs a human pass to catch layout or spacing mistakes before shipping.

Pros

  • Accepts four different input types (prompt, sketch, screenshot, URL clone) rather than prompt-only generation
  • Exports to editable Figma layers via export or a Figma plugin that works on the canvas, not just a flat image
  • Can import an existing design system so generated screens match a brand's typography, colors and components
  • Free credits refresh daily, and the annual Pro plan halves the monthly price

Cons

  • Free plan caps you at about three screens a day and a single Figma export
  • Generated screens still need manual review for layout and spacing accuracy before shipping
  • Company location could not be independently confirmed; the terms name no address or governing country

Which one fits

Choose Uizard if you need

  • Product managers sketching a concept before involving designers
  • Turning whiteboard photos or competitor screenshots into editable screens
  • Early-stage founders needing a plausible mockup for a pitch deck

Choose UXMagic AI if you need

  • Designers who want a fast first draft of a screen from a sketch, prompt, or existing site
  • Teams that already have a Figma design system and want generated screens to reuse it

Uizard vs UXMagic AI: the questions people ask

Is Uizard cheaper than UXMagic AI?

On published entry prices, Uizard starts lower — $12/mo against $35/mo for UXMagic AI. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Uizard or UXMagic AI have a free tier?

Both: Uizard has a free tier, and UXMagic AI has a free tier.

Browse all UI/UX Design & Prototyping →