Skip to content
effecthub

Figr vs Uizard

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Uizard — $12/mo vs $32/mo for Figr
Free plan
Both have one
Best fit
Figr: Product teams with an established design system to enforce · Uizard: Product managers sketching a concept before involving designers
Platforms
Figr: Web, Figma plugin, Chrome extension · Uizard: Web
Trust score
About even — Figr 89, Uizard 92

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactFigrUizard
CategoryUI/UX Design & PrototypingUI/UX Design & Prototyping
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$32/mo$12/mo
Trust score89 / 10092 / 100
PlatformsWeb, Figma plugin, Chrome extensionWeb
CompanyFigrfast Systems Private LimitedUizardApp ApS
Launched—2018
Last verifiedOct 16, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Figr

Most design generators hand you pretty screens in someone else's style; Figr's bet is that context and your own design system matter more than the pixels. Feeding it PRDs, analytics and screen recordings, then syncing output into Figma, makes it usable inside a real product team rather than as a mood-board toy. The friction is credits: the free tier is a taste, and even the $149 plan tops out at three seats.

Pros

  • Reuses your existing components and tokens instead of inventing a house style
  • Syncs output into Figma rather than keeping it in a proprietary editor
  • Takes PRDs, analytics and screen recordings as input, not just a text prompt
  • Chrome extension captures a live product as design context
  • Visual context graph shows flows and edge cases before generation

Cons

  • Everything is metered in credits and the free tier's 10 a month is barely a trial
  • Only three full seats even on the $149 Max plan
  • Context storage is capped per tier at 200MB, 1GB and 3GB per Pod
  • No public API found; integrations go through custom MCPs

Uizard

Good for getting a rough multi-screen concept in front of stakeholders within an hour; not where the real design work ends up living afterwards.

Pros

  • Output is editable components, not a flat image you have to redraw
  • Sketch and screenshot import genuinely shortens the blank-page stage
  • $12/mo entry is cheap next to mainstream design tools
  • Free tier is enough to judge whether the fidelity suits your work

Cons

  • Miro acquired it in 2024, so long-term roadmap independence is unclear
  • The free plan's 3 generations a month runs out almost immediately
  • Fidelity sits below what a designer would ship; expect to rebuild elsewhere
  • Headline prices are annual-billed, so month-to-month buyers pay more

Which one fits

Choose Figr if you need

  • Product teams with an established design system to enforce
  • Designers mapping flows and edge cases before drawing screens
  • Teams that live in Figma and will not move to another canvas

Choose Uizard if you need

  • Product managers sketching a concept before involving designers
  • Turning whiteboard photos or competitor screenshots into editable screens
  • Early-stage founders needing a plausible mockup for a pitch deck

Figr vs Uizard: the questions people ask

Is Figr cheaper than Uizard?

On published entry prices, Uizard starts lower — $12/mo against $32/mo for Figr. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Figr or Uizard have a free tier?

Both: Figr has a free tier, and Uizard has a free tier.

All Figr alternatives →Browse all UI/UX Design & Prototyping →