Skip to content
effecthub

Relume vs Uizard

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Uizard — $12/mo vs $14/mo for Relume
Free plan
Both have one
Best fit
Relume: Webflow freelancers and agencies that want sitemap and wireframe drafts from a brief in one sitting · Uizard: Product managers sketching a concept before involving designers
Trust score
About even — Relume 89, Uizard 87
Status
Both up at our last check (Sep 6, 2026)

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

RelumeGenerates a sitemap, wireframes and a publishable marketing site from a brief, built from human-made componentsUizardWireframes and UI mockups generated from text

Side by side

FactRelumeUizard
CategoryUI/UX Design & PrototypingUI/UX Design & Prototyping
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$14/mo$12/mo
Trust score89 / 10087 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb
CompanyRelume Tech Pty LtdUizard Technologies
Launched—2018
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Relume

Relume is for people who already ship marketing sites in Webflow or Figma and want the structural work, sitemap and wireframes, done in minutes from components they trust; because it assembles human-built blocks instead of generating code, the output is clean enough to hand to a client. If you do not use Webflow, Figma or React, most of what makes it valuable disappears, and the AI allowance is vague enough that heavy users should expect to climb tiers.

Pros

  • Output is built from 1,000+ human-made components, so it is predictable and exportable rather than hallucinated layout
  • Three export targets, Webflow, Figma and React with Tailwind and shadcn, from one project
  • No per-seat charge for editors, which agencies notice
  • A real free plan and a $14 entry tier, with an MCP server for agent-driven building

Cons

  • AI limits are described in words ('enough for one full website') rather than numbers
  • Every paid price is a 'from' figure, so the monthly cost is only clear at checkout
  • Hosting is still in beta, so a Relume-published site is a bet on a young service
  • Useless outside the Webflow, Figma and React ecosystems

Uizard

Good for getting a rough multi-screen concept in front of stakeholders within an hour; not where the real design work ends up living afterwards.

Pros

  • Output is editable components, not a flat image you have to redraw
  • Sketch and screenshot import genuinely shortens the blank-page stage
  • $12/mo entry is cheap next to mainstream design tools
  • Free tier is enough to judge whether the fidelity suits your work

Cons

  • Miro acquired it in 2024, so long-term roadmap independence is unclear
  • The free plan's 3 generations a month runs out almost immediately
  • Fidelity sits below what a designer would ship; expect to rebuild elsewhere
  • Headline prices are annual-billed, so month-to-month buyers pay more

Which one fits

Choose Relume if you need

  • Webflow freelancers and agencies that want sitemap and wireframe drafts from a brief in one sitting
  • Designers who want the same component system in Figma, Webflow and React without rebuilding it
  • Small teams prototyping a marketing site that will be exported, not hosted on a no-code platform forever

Choose Uizard if you need

  • Product managers sketching a concept before involving designers
  • Turning whiteboard photos or competitor screenshots into editable screens
  • Early-stage founders needing a plausible mockup for a pitch deck

Relume vs Uizard: the questions people ask

Is Relume cheaper than Uizard?

On published entry prices, Uizard starts lower — $12/mo against $14/mo for Relume. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Relume or Uizard have a free tier?

Both: Relume has a free tier, and Uizard has a free tier.

More comparisons

Browse all UI/UX Design & Prototyping →