Tulsk
Verified Oct 16, 2026 ActiveProject tracker where sandboxed AI agents pick up tickets alongside the human team
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Freemium
- Paid options from
- $39/mo
- Billing
- Monthly
Free plan includes $5 of one-off agent work. Starter $39/month bundles $50 of agent work and 6 agents; Pro $99/month bundles $120 and unlimited agents; Enterprise is quoted. The homepage separately advertised $7 per extra seat, so the seat model is not consistent across the site.
Use tool ↗About Tulsk
Tulsk is a project workspace built around agents: you file projects, tasks, sprints, cycles and dependencies as usual, then assign some of them to sandboxed AI agents that can delegate to each other. A Workspace Chat watches the board, flags risks and writes briefings. It connects to Slack natively plus Gmail, GitHub and Google Calendar, and exposes an API catalogue and an MCP server with more than fifty tools so external agents can drive it. Billing splits the subscription from the agent compute: Starter is $39 a month with $50 of agent work and up to six agents, Pro is $99 with $120 of agent work and no agent cap. No company entity or country is published.
- API
- Yes
- Last verified
- Oct 16, 2026
Verified sources
- Agent workspace description, MCP server and integrationstulsk.io ↗
- Free, Starter $39, Pro $99 and Enterprise tiers with agent-work allowancestulsk.io ↗
Is Tulsk legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- TLS certificate
- Issued by Let's Encrypt, valid until Nov 22, 2026Seen in our own connection to the site on Oct 16, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 16, 2026The site answered
- Operated by
- TulskOur research, card verified Aug 23, 2026
Pros & cons of Tulsk
Tulsk is one of the few trackers that treats agent runs as first-class work items with their own budget line, which makes the spend visible instead of buried in an LLM bill. The MCP server and API catalogue mean other agents can file and close tickets against it. It is early: no company details, no country, and the seat pricing on the homepage contradicts the pricing page.
Pros
- Agent compute is metered separately from seats, so the cost is visible
- MCP server with 50-plus tools plus a published API catalogue
- Native Slack integration alongside Gmail, GitHub and Calendar
- Free tier includes a small agent-work allowance to test with
Cons
- Homepage and pricing page disagree on how seats are charged
- No company name, country or founding date anywhere on the site
- Agent work runs out mid-month and needs topping up on top of the plan fee
Best for
- Small teams experimenting with agents doing real ticket work
- Engineering teams already wired into MCP tooling
- Slack-first teams that want briefings pushed to them
Not for
- Organisations that need a vendor they can name in a security review
- Teams wanting a settled, stable PM tool
Watch out: The plan fee and the agent-work allowance are two separate budgets; heavy agent use will exceed the bundled $50 or $120 well before the month ends.
Alternatives to Tulsk
Tulsk head-to-head
Side-by-side fact sheets against the competitors our research or their makers name — pricing, platforms, API and both verdicts on one page.
Also used for
AI tools by profession
Task & Project Management is one of the jobs on this page: