StickyPrompts vs TypingMind

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan: Both have one
Public API: StickyPrompts has one; not confirmed by us for TypingMind
Higher Trust score: StickyPrompts — 85 vs 72 for TypingMind
Best fit: StickyPrompts: European companies that need EU-only processing and redaction across every model their staff use · TypingMind: Heavy users who want one window across OpenAI, Anthropic and Google keys
Platforms: StickyPrompts: Web · TypingMind: Web, macOS, Windows

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

StickyPromptsCompany AI workspace that runs models from several providers, documents, agents and scheduled workflows against your CRM and databases.

TypingMindBring-your-own-key chat front end for GPT, Claude and Gemini

Side by side

Fact	StickyPrompts	TypingMind
Category	Multi-model Chat Aggregators	Multi-model Chat Aggregators
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Starts at	$15/mo	—
Public API	Yes	Not confirmed
Trust score	85 / 100	72 / 100
Platforms	Web, API	Web, macOS, Windows
Company	LogiNet Enterprise Software Technologies Kft.	—
Launched	—	2023
Last verified	Oct 15, 2026	Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

StickyPrompts

StickyPrompts is now a company-wide AI workspace rather than a prompt-sharing tool: one login for many models, plus agents and scheduled workflows that write to your CRM, databases and email. EU data residency, provider allow-lists and redaction before any model call make it a fit for European companies that need governance; a solo user wanting a cheap multi-model chat will find the commission model and seat bundles more than they need.

Pros

Models from several providers behind one login and one policy
Workspace-wide redaction and per-team provider allow-lists
EU data residency and EU-served inference by default
REST API and MCP server for connecting other tools

Cons

Usage beyond the included amount carries a commission on top of provider prices, up to 20% on Free
Seats come in bundles (3, 20, 100), so team size and price do not scale smoothly
SOC 2 is listed as in progress

TypingMind

The right buy if you already pay for API credits and resent a second $20/month subscription per model vendor. Pointless if you only use one model casually, because the raw ChatGPT or Claude app is free and better integrated.

Pros

One-time personal licence instead of a recurring fee is genuinely rare in this category
Model coverage is broad, including self-hosted OpenAI-compatible endpoints
Teams edition covers SSO, RBAC and audit logs, which most BYOK front ends do not

Cons

You pay token costs on top of the licence, so heavy use is not cheaper than a flat subscription
Feature parity with vendor apps always lags after a model launch
Desktop presence is mostly a browser install rather than a full native app

Which one fits

Choose StickyPrompts if you need

European companies that need EU-only processing and redaction across every model their staff use
Teams wanting scheduled AI workflows that act in their CRM, databases and email
Organisations consolidating separate ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini subscriptions

Choose TypingMind if you need

Heavy users who want one window across OpenAI, Anthropic and Google keys
Teams that need shared prompts and preset keys without giving everyone a seat on each vendor
People who want chat history in their own browser or storage rather than a vendor account