Skip to content
effecthub

StickyPrompts vs TypingMind

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. StickyPrompts publishes a starting price ($49); TypingMind does not. Only TypingMind has a free tier.

StickyPromptsOne team workspace for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and other models with shared prompts and credits.TypingMindBring-your-own-key chat front end for GPT, Claude and Gemini

Side by side

FactStickyPromptsTypingMind
CategoryMulti-model Chat AggregatorsMulti-model Chat Aggregators
Pricing modelPaidFreemium
Starts at$49 month—
Public APINoNo
PlatformsWeb, Chrome ExtWeb, macOS, Windows
CompanyArtificial Platforms Inc.—
Launched—2023
Last verifiedSep 1, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

StickyPrompts

A shared credit pool across several model providers, instead of paying for ChatGPT Plus, Claude Pro, and Gemini separately per person, is the actual value case here, and the browser extension extends that access outside a dedicated chat window. Pricing is team-banded rather than per seat, so a 2-person team pays the same $49 floor as a near-10-person one, and the site itself credits two different companies for it without explaining the relationship.

Pros

  • access to several model providers from one shared credit pool
  • browser extension for using it inside other web apps
  • shared prompt management built for team collaboration
  • 1,000 free credits included to try it before paying

Cons

  • team-banded pricing means a 2-person team pays the same base rate as a near-10-person one
  • credit multipliers per model make real cost per query hard to predict upfront
  • site credits two different company names without clarifying the relationship between them

TypingMind

The right buy if you already pay for API credits and resent a second $20/month subscription per model vendor. Pointless if you only use one model casually, because the raw ChatGPT or Claude app is free and better integrated.

Pros

  • One-time personal licence instead of a recurring fee is genuinely rare in this category
  • Model coverage is broad, including self-hosted OpenAI-compatible endpoints
  • Teams edition covers SSO, RBAC and audit logs, which most BYOK front ends do not

Cons

  • You pay token costs on top of the licence, so heavy use is not cheaper than a flat subscription
  • Feature parity with vendor apps always lags after a model launch
  • Desktop presence is mostly a browser install rather than a full native app

Which one fits

Choose StickyPrompts if you need

  • small teams currently paying for multiple separate AI chat subscriptions per person
  • teams that want shared prompt management alongside model access

Choose TypingMind if you need

  • Heavy users who want one window across OpenAI, Anthropic and Google keys
  • Teams that need shared prompts and preset keys without giving everyone a seat on each vendor
  • People who want chat history in their own browser or storage rather than a vendor account

More comparisons

Browse all Multi-model Chat Aggregators →