Skip to content
effecthub

AmigoChat vs TypingMind

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Both have one
Higher Trust score
AmigoChat — 80 vs 72 for TypingMind
Best fit
AmigoChat: Casual users who want several frontier models for one low monthly fee · TypingMind: Heavy users who want one window across OpenAI, Anthropic and Google keys
Platforms
AmigoChat: Web, iOS, Android · TypingMind: Web, macOS, Windows
Status
Both up at our last check — AmigoChat Oct 15, 2026, TypingMind Oct 16, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactAmigoChatTypingMind
CategoryMulti-model Chat AggregatorsMulti-model Chat Aggregators
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$14.99/mo—
Trust score80 / 10072 / 100
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, macOS, Windows
CompanyBoiler Labs FZ-LLC—
Launched—2023
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

AmigoChat

One subscription covering chat, image and video models from several vendors is cheaper than paying each of them, and the mobile apps are the real draw. The AmigoChat name is gone; the successor, Overchat AI, is run by Boiler Labs FZ-LLC under UAE law, and the credit metering means the advanced models on the marketing page cost far more per message than the everyday ones.

Pros

  • Single subscription instead of separate ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini plans
  • Free tier with daily credits for evaluation
  • iOS and Android apps shipping today, not promised

Cons

  • The AmigoChat brand and its app-store listing are gone; old links break
  • Operator is a Ras Al Khaimah free-zone company with UAE governing law, which complicates disputes for EU or US buyers
  • Desktop apps and browser extensions are still labelled coming soon

TypingMind

The right buy if you already pay for API credits and resent a second $20/month subscription per model vendor. Pointless if you only use one model casually, because the raw ChatGPT or Claude app is free and better integrated.

Pros

  • One-time personal licence instead of a recurring fee is genuinely rare in this category
  • Model coverage is broad, including self-hosted OpenAI-compatible endpoints
  • Teams edition covers SSO, RBAC and audit logs, which most BYOK front ends do not

Cons

  • You pay token costs on top of the licence, so heavy use is not cheaper than a flat subscription
  • Feature parity with vendor apps always lags after a model launch
  • Desktop presence is mostly a browser install rather than a full native app

Which one fits

Choose AmigoChat if you need

  • Casual users who want several frontier models for one low monthly fee
  • Phone-first users who prefer a native app over a browser tab
  • People who mix chat with occasional image or video generation

Choose TypingMind if you need

  • Heavy users who want one window across OpenAI, Anthropic and Google keys
  • Teams that need shared prompts and preset keys without giving everyone a seat on each vendor
  • People who want chat history in their own browser or storage rather than a vendor account

AmigoChat vs TypingMind: the questions people ask

Is AmigoChat cheaper than TypingMind?

AmigoChat starts at $14.99/mo. TypingMind has a free tier; what its paid plans cost is not confirmed by us yet.

Does AmigoChat or TypingMind have a free tier?

Both: AmigoChat has a free tier, and TypingMind has a free tier.

All AmigoChat alternatives →Browse all Multi-model Chat Aggregators →