Skip to content
effecthub

Poe vs StickyPrompts

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Only Poe (StickyPrompts has paid plans only)
Public API
Poe has one; not confirmed by us for StickyPrompts
Higher Trust score
Poe — 90 vs 78 for StickyPrompts
Best fit
Poe: People who want several vendors' models under one login and one bill · StickyPrompts: small teams currently paying for multiple separate AI chat subscriptions per person
Platforms
Poe: Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows · StickyPrompts: Web, Chrome extension

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactPoeStickyPrompts
CategoryMulti-model Chat AggregatorsMulti-model Chat Aggregators
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starts at—$49/mo
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score90 / 10078 / 100
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, APIWeb, Chrome extension
CompanyQuoraArtificial Platforms Inc.
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 1, 2026

What our research says

Poe

Poe makes sense if you want to compare frontier models side by side without paying each vendor, and the custom-bot layer is a cheap way to publish a prompt as a product. The catch is the points meter: one subscription buys wildly different quantities of use depending on which bot you pick, and per-bot costs are Poe's to change, so the plan you buy is not necessarily the plan you keep.

Pros

  • One subscription spans models from several vendors plus image and video generators
  • Custom bots can be built from a prompt and shared or monetised
  • Apps on web, iOS, Android, Mac and Windows
  • A creator API exists for developers

Cons

  • Points pricing makes real capacity hard to predict across models
  • Per-bot point costs and allowances are set by Poe and change over time
  • The home page blocks automated access and the subscription page shows regional prices, so USD figures could not be confirmed from the vendor
  • No team or enterprise tier is visible

StickyPrompts

A shared credit pool across several model providers, instead of paying for ChatGPT Plus, Claude Pro, and Gemini separately per person, is the actual value case here, and the browser extension extends that access outside a dedicated chat window. Pricing is team-banded rather than per seat, so a 2-person team pays the same $49 floor as a near-10-person one, and the site itself credits two different companies for it without explaining the relationship.

Pros

  • access to several model providers from one shared credit pool
  • browser extension for using it inside other web apps
  • shared prompt management built for team collaboration
  • 1,000 free credits included to try it before paying

Cons

  • team-banded pricing means a 2-person team pays the same base rate as a near-10-person one
  • credit multipliers per model make real cost per query hard to predict upfront
  • site credits two different company names without clarifying the relationship between them

Which one fits

Choose Poe if you need

  • People who want several vendors' models under one login and one bill
  • Creators publishing custom bots without hosting anything
  • Comparing model answers side by side before committing to one vendor

Choose StickyPrompts if you need

  • small teams currently paying for multiple separate AI chat subscriptions per person
  • teams that want shared prompt management alongside model access

Poe vs StickyPrompts: the questions people ask

Is Poe cheaper than StickyPrompts?

StickyPrompts starts at $49/mo. Poe has a free tier; what its paid plans cost is not confirmed by us yet.

Does Poe or StickyPrompts have a free tier?

Poe has a free tier; StickyPrompts has paid plans only.

Which has a public API, Poe or StickyPrompts?

Poe ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for StickyPrompts is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All Poe alternatives →Browse all Multi-model Chat Aggregators →