Skip to content
effecthub

Relevance AI vs Sistava

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Relevance AI — $19/mo vs $50/mo for Sistava
Free plan
Only Sistava (Relevance AI has paid plans only)
Public API
Relevance AI has one; not confirmed by us for Sistava
Higher Trust score
Relevance AI — 96 vs 82 for Sistava
Best fit
Relevance AI: Ops and go-to-market teams automating repetitive research or outreach · Sistava: Teams wanting to automate a specific, bounded workflow rather than a whole department

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactRelevance AISistava
CategoryAI Agents & Autonomous WorkersAI Agents & Autonomous Workers
Pricing modelPaidFreemium
Starts at$19/mo$50/mo
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score96 / 10082 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb
CompanyOnSearch Pty LtdSista AI B.V.
Launched2020—
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 14, 2026

What our research says

Relevance AI

A credible no-code agent builder with a wide library of ready-made sales and ops agents, but the free tier is gone and the self-serve prices live on a docs page while the marketing site pushes everyone to a sales call. The two-meter billing — Actions plus pass-through Vendor Credits — makes running cost hard to forecast, and the $19 annual Pro plan only covers one project and two builders.

Pros

  • Agents get tools, knowledge and schedules without any code
  • Large library of pre-built agents for sales, support, HR and ops that can be customised
  • Model cost is passed through on vendor credits rather than marked up
  • Agents can be grouped into teams that hand work between each other

Cons

  • No free plan any more, only paid Pro and Team or an Enterprise quote
  • Two simultaneous meters make budgeting awkward and surprises likely
  • Top-up rates are steep at $80 per 1,000 actions
  • Pro is limited to one project and two build users, so a second workspace means the $349 Team plan

Sistava

Fits a team that wants to automate specific, well-defined tasks without pretending an AI agent can run a whole department. The free tier is a real way to test one workflow before paying, but credits that vary by model and task, four paid tiers and separate top-up packs make the monthly bill hard to predict.

Pros

  • Explicitly scoped to repeatable workflows rather than overselling full autonomy
  • Free tier available to test before paying
  • Four-tier pricing ladder from $50 lets teams scale spend with actual usage rather than jumping straight to an enterprise deal

Cons

  • Credit use varies by model and task, and top-up packs sit on top of the plan price, so monthly cost is hard to predict upfront
  • Per-tier credit allowances and employee capacity are not spelled out on the pricing page

Which one fits

Choose Relevance AI if you need

  • Ops and go-to-market teams automating repetitive research or outreach
  • Companies that want working agents without hiring engineers to build them
  • Workloads where per-task cost matters more than per-seat cost

Choose Sistava if you need

  • Teams wanting to automate a specific, bounded workflow rather than a whole department
  • Operators who want to start free before committing to a paid tier

Relevance AI vs Sistava: the questions people ask

Is Relevance AI cheaper than Sistava?

On published entry prices, Relevance AI starts lower — $19/mo against $50/mo for Sistava. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Relevance AI or Sistava have a free tier?

Sistava has a free tier; Relevance AI has paid plans only.

Which has a public API, Relevance AI or Sistava?

Relevance AI ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Sistava is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All Sistava alternatives →Browse all AI Agents & Autonomous Workers →