Lindy vs Relevance AI

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan: Only Relevance AI (Lindy has paid plans only)
Public API: Relevance AI has one; not confirmed by us for Lindy
Higher Trust score: Lindy — 93 vs 87 for Relevance AI
Best fit: Lindy: Sales, support and ops teams automating email triage, follow-ups and scheduling · Relevance AI: Ops and go-to-market teams automating repetitive research or outreach
Status: Both up at our last check (Sep 6, 2026)

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

LindyAI teammates that work inside email, calendar, meetings and a browser, built from triggers and skills without code

Relevance AIBuilds and runs a workforce of custom agents

Side by side

Fact	Lindy	Relevance AI
Category	AI Agents & Autonomous Workers	AI Agents & Autonomous Workers
Pricing model	Paid	Freemium
Starts at	$49.99/seat/mo	—
Public API	Not confirmed	Yes
Trust score	93 / 100	87 / 100
Platforms	Web	Web, API
Company	Crivello Corp	OnSearch Pty Ltd
Launched	—	2020
Last verified	Sep 6, 2026	Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Lindy

Lindy is for a business team that wants agents acting on real inboxes and calendars this week, with the plumbing to 1,500 apps already done; the skills library and meeting recorder make it closer to a junior colleague than a Zapier flow. The bill is credits per active user, and the free plan is now a seven-day trial rather than a standing tier, so a solo user who wants to run one automation for free should look elsewhere. Engineers who want to own the orchestration will find the canvas limiting.

Pros

Trigger-and-steps builder with 40+ reusable skills, no code required
Agents can send email, schedule, join meetings and operate a browser on Pro and above
1,500+ integrations plus MCP server support
Credits are pooled across the team and top-ups are priced plainly at $10 per 1,000
Enterprise tier offers HIPAA with a signed BAA, SSO, SCIM and audit logs

Cons

Billing is per active user plus credits, so cost rises with both seats and volume
The free plan is a 7-day, $50-credit trial, not an ongoing allowance
No yearly pricing or public API is shown on the pricing page
Legal entity is Crivello Corp in Oregon, named only in the terms

Relevance AI

A credible no-code agent builder, but pricing has moved behind a sales conversation and the two-meter billing makes running cost genuinely hard to forecast.

Pros

Agents get tools, knowledge and schedules without any code
Free tier of 200 actions a month is enough to prototype something real
Model cost is passed through without markup on vendor credits
Agents can be grouped into teams that hand work between each other

Cons

Self-serve prices are no longer published anywhere on the site
Two simultaneous meters make budgeting awkward and surprises likely
Top-up rates are steep at $80 per 1,000 actions
Smaller vendor than the incumbents it is competing against

Which one fits

Choose Lindy if you need

Sales, support and ops teams automating email triage, follow-ups and scheduling
Founders who want one agent across Gmail, Slack, Notion and HubSpot without hiring an integrator
Teams that record and query their meetings and want the notes to trigger actions

Choose Relevance AI if you need

Ops and go-to-market teams automating repetitive research or outreach
Companies that want working agents without hiring engineers to build them
Workloads where per-task cost matters more than per-seat cost