Skip to content
effecthub

Cronloop vs Relevance AI

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Relevance AI — $19/mo vs $25/mo for Cronloop
Free plan
Only Cronloop (Relevance AI has paid plans only)
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Relevance AI — 96 vs 84 for Cronloop
Best fit
Cronloop: Solo operators and small teams automating recurring, tool-connected tasks · Relevance AI: Ops and go-to-market teams automating repetitive research or outreach

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactCronloopRelevance AI
CategoryAI Agents & Autonomous WorkersAI Agents & Autonomous Workers
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starts at$25/mo$19/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score84 / 10096 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, API
CompanyCactal, Inc.OnSearch Pty Ltd
Launched20262020
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Cronloop

A good fit for someone who already has a handful of repetitive, tool-connected tasks and wants them running on autopilot with memory instead of rebuilding an automation chain each time. The free tier's 200 run-minutes is enough to validate a couple of workflows before paying $25 a month.

Pros

  • Markdown-defined jobs are easy to read and version instead of a locked visual builder
  • Persistent memory between scheduled runs lets agents build on prior context
  • MCP server support means it can be driven directly from Claude or ChatGPT
  • 50+ tool integrations including Gmail, HubSpot, Slack, and GitHub

Cons

  • Free tier's 10-minute run cap and hourly scheduling limit rule out longer or more time-sensitive jobs
  • Requires bringing your own OpenAI or Anthropic API key or subscription for the underlying model calls

Relevance AI

A credible no-code agent builder with a wide library of ready-made sales and ops agents, but the free tier is gone and the self-serve prices live on a docs page while the marketing site pushes everyone to a sales call. The two-meter billing — Actions plus pass-through Vendor Credits — makes running cost hard to forecast, and the $19 annual Pro plan only covers one project and two builders.

Pros

  • Agents get tools, knowledge and schedules without any code
  • Large library of pre-built agents for sales, support, HR and ops that can be customised
  • Model cost is passed through on vendor credits rather than marked up
  • Agents can be grouped into teams that hand work between each other

Cons

  • No free plan any more, only paid Pro and Team or an Enterprise quote
  • Two simultaneous meters make budgeting awkward and surprises likely
  • Top-up rates are steep at $80 per 1,000 actions
  • Pro is limited to one project and two build users, so a second workspace means the $349 Team plan

Which one fits

Choose Cronloop if you need

  • Solo operators and small teams automating recurring, tool-connected tasks
  • Users who already work inside Claude or ChatGPT via MCP

Choose Relevance AI if you need

  • Ops and go-to-market teams automating repetitive research or outreach
  • Companies that want working agents without hiring engineers to build them
  • Workloads where per-task cost matters more than per-seat cost

Cronloop vs Relevance AI: the questions people ask

Is Cronloop cheaper than Relevance AI?

On published entry prices, Relevance AI starts lower — $19/mo against $25/mo for Cronloop. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Cronloop or Relevance AI have a free tier?

Cronloop has a free tier; Relevance AI has paid plans only.

Which has a public API, Cronloop or Relevance AI?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

All Cronloop alternatives →Browse all AI Agents & Autonomous Workers →