Skip to content
effecthub

Pallix vs Profound

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Public API
Profound has one; not confirmed by us for Pallix
Higher Trust score
Profound — 83 vs 75 for Pallix
Best fit
Pallix: Marketing teams wanting visibility into AI-recommendation mentions · Profound: Enterprise marketing teams that need AI-answer share of voice across many engines with exports and an API
Status
Both up at our last check — Pallix Sep 1, 2026, Profound Sep 6, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactPallixProfound
CategoryAI Visibility & AEO/GEOAI Visibility & AEO/GEO
Pricing modelPaidContact
Starts at$25.70/mo—
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score75 / 10083 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb, API
CompanyPallix Technologies Pvt LtdProfound
Last verifiedSep 1, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Pallix

Pallix answers a question brand teams increasingly ask, whether ChatGPT and similar tools recommend them at all, and it goes further than a simple mention count by tracing citation sources and turning gaps into a work list. Pricing is only published in rupees, which makes it harder for teams outside India to gauge the real cost against dollar-priced competitors.

Pros

  • Tracks recommendations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini specifically
  • Maps which sources AI answers are citing about a brand
  • Pulls competitor and community signals from Reddit and YouTube
  • Offers a free audit before signing up

Cons

  • Prices are shown only in INR on the pricing page
  • No self-serve enterprise pricing; agencies must contact sales
  • A young company with limited independent reviews so far

Profound

Profound is the enterprise end of AI-visibility measurement: it covers more answer engines than most rivals, adds crawler analytics and ChatGPT Shopping that the cheaper trackers lack, and has the funding and customer list to still exist next year. The price is the reason to hesitate - there is no published figure, the free trial is seven days of fifty prompts, and the self-serve agency plan exists only as a line in the FAQ. Mid-market teams will get most of the signal from a tracker with a public price; brands with real budget and a procurement team are the audience here.

Pros

  • Tracks up to nine answer engines, including AI Overviews, Copilot and DeepSeek, not just ChatGPT
  • Agent Analytics shows which AI crawlers visit and cite the site, a layer most trackers skip
  • Prompt Volumes estimates real user questions rather than relying on your own prompt list
  • SOC 2 Type II, SSO and an API, so it passes enterprise review

Cons

  • No published price; the only listed plans are a free trial and a custom Enterprise contract
  • Trial is 7 days, 50 prompts and three engines, with no exports or history
  • No legal entity, address or terms page found on the site
  • The agency plan is named in the FAQ but not in the plan table

Which one fits

Choose Pallix if you need

  • Marketing teams wanting visibility into AI-recommendation mentions
  • Agencies managing AI visibility across several client brands
  • Brands wanting to know which sources feed their AI citations

Choose Profound if you need

  • Enterprise marketing teams that need AI-answer share of voice across many engines with exports and an API
  • Retail brands that want SKU-level visibility inside ChatGPT Shopping
  • Agencies managing several clients who can negotiate the workspace-based plan

Pallix vs Profound: the questions people ask

Is Pallix cheaper than Profound?

Pallix starts at $25.70/mo; Profound prices on request, so a quote is the only way to compare.

Which has a public API, Pallix or Profound?

Profound ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Pallix is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

Browse all AI Visibility & AEO/GEO →