Am I on AI? vs Profound

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Public API: Both have one
Higher Trust score: Profound — 83 vs 75 for Am I on AI?
Best fit: Am I on AI?: Marketing teams wanting a simple, reportable score for AI visibility · Profound: Enterprise marketing teams that need AI-answer share of voice across many engines with exports and an API
Status: Both up at our last check — Am I on AI? Sep 1, 2026, Profound Sep 6, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Am I on AI?Tracks how often a brand gets mentioned in ChatGPT and Google AI Overview answers and grades the result letter-style.

ProfoundMeasures how ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and AI Overviews describe and cite a brand, then drafts the fixes.

Side by side

Fact	Am I on AI?	Profound
Category	AI Visibility & AEO/GEO	AI Visibility & AEO/GEO
Pricing model	Paid	Contact
Starts at	$100/mo	—
Public API	Yes	Yes
Trust score	75 / 100	83 / 100
Platforms	Web, API	Web, API
Company	Mindshare AI	Profound
Last verified	Sep 1, 2026	Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Am I on AI?

Am I On AI covers the two AI surfaces marketers currently care about most, ChatGPT and Google AI Overview, with a simple letter-grade framing that's easy to report up to non-technical stakeholders. It tracks fewer AI platforms than some competitors that also cover Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini directly.

Pros

Clear letter-grade scoring makes results easy to report to non-specialists
Citation-source analysis shows which domains are actually driving AI mentions
API access allows pulling the data into other reporting workflows

Cons

Only ChatGPT and Google AI Overview are confirmed as tracked platforms, narrower than some competitors
Entry price of 100 dollars a month is steep for a single-segment view

Profound

Profound is the enterprise end of AI-visibility measurement: it covers more answer engines than most rivals, adds crawler analytics and ChatGPT Shopping that the cheaper trackers lack, and has the funding and customer list to still exist next year. The price is the reason to hesitate - there is no published figure, the free trial is seven days of fifty prompts, and the self-serve agency plan exists only as a line in the FAQ. Mid-market teams will get most of the signal from a tracker with a public price; brands with real budget and a procurement team are the audience here.

Pros

Tracks up to nine answer engines, including AI Overviews, Copilot and DeepSeek, not just ChatGPT
Agent Analytics shows which AI crawlers visit and cite the site, a layer most trackers skip
Prompt Volumes estimates real user questions rather than relying on your own prompt list
SOC 2 Type II, SSO and an API, so it passes enterprise review

Cons

No published price; the only listed plans are a free trial and a custom Enterprise contract
Trial is 7 days, 50 prompts and three engines, with no exports or history
No legal entity, address or terms page found on the site
The agency plan is named in the FAQ but not in the plan table

Which one fits

Choose Am I on AI? if you need

Marketing teams wanting a simple, reportable score for AI visibility
Agencies benchmarking client brands against named competitors
Teams wanting weekly, prescriptive action items rather than raw data

Choose Profound if you need

Enterprise marketing teams that need AI-answer share of voice across many engines with exports and an API
Retail brands that want SKU-level visibility inside ChatGPT Shopping
Agencies managing several clients who can negotiate the workspace-based plan