Skip to content
effecthub

Genrank vs Profound

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Profound — 83 vs 72 for Genrank
Best fit
Genrank: Marketing teams needing to prove AI-search visibility to stakeholders · Profound: Enterprise marketing teams that need AI-answer share of voice across many engines with exports and an API
Status
Both up at our last check — Genrank Sep 1, 2026, Profound Sep 6, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactGenrankProfound
CategoryAI Visibility & AEO/GEOAI Visibility & AEO/GEO
Pricing modelPaidContact
Starts at$69/mo—
Public APIYesYes
Trust score72 / 10083 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, API
CompanyGenrankProfound
Last verifiedSep 1, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Genrank

Genrank answers a question that's getting harder to ignore — how often does a brand actually get mentioned when someone asks ChatGPT for a recommendation — and turns it into a trackable, prompt-level metric with competitor comparison. Whether the tracked-prompt count on the entry plan is enough depends heavily on how many distinct buyer questions a brand needs to monitor.

Pros

  • Tracks brand mentions and citations specifically inside AI chatbot answers, not just web search
  • Includes competitor advertising insight alongside visibility tracking
  • Three clear tiers plus custom enterprise pricing

Cons

  • Entry plan's 25 tracked prompts may be too few for brands with many buyer questions to monitor
  • No company name, founders, or headquarters disclosed
  • Custom tier pricing requires a sales conversation

Profound

Profound is the enterprise end of AI-visibility measurement: it covers more answer engines than most rivals, adds crawler analytics and ChatGPT Shopping that the cheaper trackers lack, and has the funding and customer list to still exist next year. The price is the reason to hesitate - there is no published figure, the free trial is seven days of fifty prompts, and the self-serve agency plan exists only as a line in the FAQ. Mid-market teams will get most of the signal from a tracker with a public price; brands with real budget and a procurement team are the audience here.

Pros

  • Tracks up to nine answer engines, including AI Overviews, Copilot and DeepSeek, not just ChatGPT
  • Agent Analytics shows which AI crawlers visit and cite the site, a layer most trackers skip
  • Prompt Volumes estimates real user questions rather than relying on your own prompt list
  • SOC 2 Type II, SSO and an API, so it passes enterprise review

Cons

  • No published price; the only listed plans are a free trial and a custom Enterprise contract
  • Trial is 7 days, 50 prompts and three engines, with no exports or history
  • No legal entity, address or terms page found on the site
  • The agency plan is named in the FAQ but not in the plan table

Which one fits

Choose Genrank if you need

  • Marketing teams needing to prove AI-search visibility to stakeholders
  • Agencies managing AI visibility across multiple client brands
  • Companies in categories where AI assistants increasingly influence discovery

Choose Profound if you need

  • Enterprise marketing teams that need AI-answer share of voice across many engines with exports and an API
  • Retail brands that want SKU-level visibility inside ChatGPT Shopping
  • Agencies managing several clients who can negotiate the workspace-based plan

Genrank vs Profound: the questions people ask

Is Genrank cheaper than Profound?

Genrank starts at $69/mo; Profound prices on request, so a quote is the only way to compare.

Which has a public API, Genrank or Profound?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

Browse all AI Visibility & AEO/GEO →