Skip to content
effecthub

Hyper3D vs Meshy

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Hyper3D starts at $30, Meshy at $20. Both have a free tier. Both ship a public API.

Hyper3DGenerates 3D models from text or a reference image, exporting to GLB, FBX, OBJ, STL, GLTF, and USDZ.MeshyGenerates rigged, textured 3D models from prompts or reference images

Side by side

FactHyper3DMeshy
Category3D Model Generation3D Model Generation
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$30 month$20 month
Public APIYesYes
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, API
CompanyDeemos CorporationMeshy
Launched—2023
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

Hyper3D

One of the few text-to-3D services that treats export formats and DCC integration as first-class rather than an afterthought, which is what decides whether generated geometry is usable downstream. The pay-by-result free tier lets you see the model before spending, a fairer arrangement than most credit systems. API access is gated to the $120 tier, which is a real jump for anyone automating.

Pros

  • Exports to STL, FBX, OBJ, GLB, GLTF, and USDZ with documented DCC integrations
  • Free tier previews the result before you confirm and spend a credit
  • Documented API for programmatic generation and asset management
  • Separate education access for students and classrooms

Cons

  • API access requires the $120/month Business tier
  • Pay-as-you-go credits at $1.50 each get expensive quickly outside a subscription
  • Model counts per tier are estimates, not guarantees
  • Generated meshes still need retopology for animation work

Meshy

The default pick for fast 3D from prompts or concept art, and the auto-rigging plus first-party engine plugins are what separate it from the pack. Topology is still dense enough that hero assets need a retopo pass before they go into production.

Pros

  • Free plan gives 100 credits a month, enough to genuinely evaluate it
  • Auto-rigging with 600+ motion presets removes an entire manual stage
  • First-party plugins for Blender, Unity, Unreal, Godot, Maya and Roblox Studio
  • REST API opens at the $20 Pro tier rather than behind enterprise sales

Cons

  • Free-tier output is licensed CC BY 4.0; asset ownership only comes with a paid plan
  • Generated meshes are often dense and need retopology for animation-heavy work
  • Monthly credits reset and vanish; only purchased top-up credits carry over
  • Concurrency is capped (10 simultaneous tasks on Pro), which throttles bulk runs

Which one fits

Choose Hyper3D if you need

  • Game and XR teams filling out background props and set dressing
  • Concepting a shape from a reference image before modelling it properly
  • Pipelines needing USDZ or GLB output for AR and web viewers

Choose Meshy if you need

  • Indie game devs filling scenes with props and background assets
  • Concept artists turning 2D sketches into blockout meshes
  • 3D printing, where output is watertight and slicer-ready
  • Pipelines that want 3D generation available behind an API

More comparisons

Browse all 3D Model Generation →