Glean vs Super Amplify

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan: Super Amplify has one; Glean prices on request
Public API: Glean has one; not confirmed by us for Super Amplify
Best fit: Glean: Organisations above roughly 500 people whose knowledge is scattered across a dozen SaaS tools · Super Amplify: companies wanting department-specific AI assistants under one governance layer
Platforms: Glean: Web, Slack app, Chrome extension · Super Amplify: Web
Trust score: About even — Glean 90, Super Amplify 86

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

GleanPermission-aware search and agents across company applications

Super AmplifyEnterprise AI platform bundling department chat agents, workflow automation, and data governance.

Side by side

Fact	Glean	Super Amplify
Category	Personal & Enterprise Search	AI Agents & Autonomous Workers
Pricing model	Contact	Freemium
Starts at	—	$47/seat/mo
Public API	Yes	Not confirmed
Trust score	90 / 100	86 / 100
Platforms	Web, API, Slack app, Chrome extension	Web
Company	Glean Technologies, Inc.	Super Amplify LLC
Launched	2019	—
Last verified	Oct 16, 2026	Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Glean

Glean is the reference implementation of permission-aware enterprise search, and permissions are the hard part everyone else underestimates. It is also priced so that only companies with a real sprawl problem can justify it.

Pros

Permission inheritance from each connected system is done properly, not approximated
Answers cite and link the underlying documents rather than paraphrasing them away
Connector coverage across the mainstream SaaS estate is broad
Commercially solid: about $300M ARR by May 2026 at a $7.2B valuation

Cons

No published price anywhere, and contracts start in six figures
Value depends entirely on connector coverage of your specific stack
Index quality inherits whatever mess exists in the source systems
Overlaps increasingly with Microsoft and Google's bundled offerings, which cost nothing extra

Super Amplify

Super Amplify's pitch is consolidation — one governed platform instead of a pile of disconnected department tools — and the on-prem/hybrid deployment option is a real differentiator for companies that won't put data in a pure SaaS. The custom 'suptoken' unit makes it hard to compare cost against competitors without doing your own usage math first.

Pros

department-scoped AI assistants (MyAgents) rather than one generic bot
hybrid and on-premise deployment options
data-governance and security framing built into the pitch
3-day free trial on the paid Pro tier

Cons

pricing is denominated in a proprietary 'suptoken' unit that's hard to compare to competitors
enterprise features are described in marketing terms without much technical detail
no free-form API access documented

Which one fits

Choose Glean if you need

Organisations above roughly 500 people whose knowledge is scattered across a dozen SaaS tools
Regulated or security-conscious buyers who need source-system permissions honoured exactly
Teams building internal agents that need governed access to company context

Choose Super Amplify if you need

companies wanting department-specific AI assistants under one governance layer
organizations that need hybrid or on-premise deployment