Skip to content
effecthub

amaiko vs Glean

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Public API
Glean has one; not confirmed by us for amaiko
Higher Trust score
Glean — 90 vs 78 for amaiko
Best fit
amaiko: Organizations already standardized on Microsoft Teams and 365 wanting an assistant without adding a new app · Glean: Organisations above roughly 500 people whose knowledge is scattered across a dozen SaaS tools
Platforms
amaiko: Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android · Glean: Web, Slack app, Chrome extension
Status
Both up at our last check — amaiko Oct 15, 2026, Glean Oct 16, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactamaikoGlean
CategoryPersonal AI AssistantsPersonal & Enterprise Search
Pricing modelPaidContact
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score78 / 10090 / 100
PlatformsWeb, Windows, macOS, iOS, AndroidWeb, API, Slack app, Chrome extension
Companyamaiko GmbHGlean Technologies, Inc.
Launched20252019
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 16, 2026

What our research says

amaiko

amaiko's pitch is avoiding another app: it lives entirely inside Teams and Microsoft 365, drafting documents and minutes and triaging email using context it's already absorbed from an organization's conversations. The German hosting and GDPR framing is a real differentiator for European buyers specifically, but that also makes the pitch narrower for teams outside the Microsoft ecosystem or outside Europe.

Pros

  • Runs natively inside Teams rather than as a separate destination app
  • Connects across the full Microsoft 365 suite plus Google Workspace, HubSpot, and Dynamics 365
  • German hosting and GDPR compliance explicitly addressed, including a certified R&D status seal
  • One-click installation from the Teams store

Cons

  • Priced in euros, so US-based buyers deal with currency conversion and exchange-rate drift
  • Deep dependence on the Microsoft 365 ecosystem limits it for mixed-tool organizations
  • Per-seat pricing scales linearly with headcount, which adds up for larger teams

Glean

Glean is the reference implementation of permission-aware enterprise search, and permissions are the hard part everyone else underestimates. It is also priced so that only companies with a real sprawl problem can justify it.

Pros

  • Permission inheritance from each connected system is done properly, not approximated
  • Answers cite and link the underlying documents rather than paraphrasing them away
  • Connector coverage across the mainstream SaaS estate is broad
  • Commercially solid: about $300M ARR by May 2026 at a $7.2B valuation

Cons

  • No published price anywhere, and contracts start in six figures
  • Value depends entirely on connector coverage of your specific stack
  • Index quality inherits whatever mess exists in the source systems
  • Overlaps increasingly with Microsoft and Google's bundled offerings, which cost nothing extra

Which one fits

Choose amaiko if you need

  • Organizations already standardized on Microsoft Teams and 365 wanting an assistant without adding a new app
  • European companies for whom GDPR compliance and German data hosting are a procurement requirement
  • Teams wanting inbox triage handled automatically, with meeting minutes available as a paid add-on

Choose Glean if you need

  • Organisations above roughly 500 people whose knowledge is scattered across a dozen SaaS tools
  • Regulated or security-conscious buyers who need source-system permissions honoured exactly
  • Teams building internal agents that need governed access to company context

amaiko vs Glean: the questions people ask

Which has a public API, amaiko or Glean?

Glean ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for amaiko is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

Browse all Personal AI Assistants →