Skip to content
effecthub

Glean vs Stilla

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Stilla has one; Glean prices on request
Public API
Glean has one; not confirmed by us for Stilla
Higher Trust score
Glean — 90 vs 67 for Stilla
Best fit
Glean: Organisations above roughly 500 people whose knowledge is scattered across a dozen SaaS tools · Stilla: Teams that live in Slack or Teams and will not open another dashboard
Platforms
Glean: Web, Slack app, Chrome extension · Stilla: Web, Slack app

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactGleanStilla
CategoryPersonal & Enterprise SearchAI Agents & Autonomous Workers
Pricing modelContactFreemium
Starts at—$40/mo
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score90 / 10067 / 100
PlatformsWeb, API, Slack app, Chrome extensionWeb, Slack app
CompanyGlean Technologies, Inc.—
Launched2019—
Last verifiedOct 16, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Glean

Glean is the reference implementation of permission-aware enterprise search, and permissions are the hard part everyone else underestimates. It is also priced so that only companies with a real sprawl problem can justify it.

Pros

  • Permission inheritance from each connected system is done properly, not approximated
  • Answers cite and link the underlying documents rather than paraphrasing them away
  • Connector coverage across the mainstream SaaS estate is broad
  • Commercially solid: about $300M ARR by May 2026 at a $7.2B valuation

Cons

  • No published price anywhere, and contracts start in six figures
  • Value depends entirely on connector coverage of your specific stack
  • Index quality inherits whatever mess exists in the source systems
  • Overlaps increasingly with Microsoft and Google's bundled offerings, which cost nothing extra

Stilla

Delegating by @-mention in the tool you are already in removes the main reason agent products go unused, and the credit generosity at the free tier lets you find out whether it works on your real backlog. Pricing per organisation rather than per seat is unusually sane. The weak spot is that nothing on the site names the company or its jurisdiction.

Pros

  • Delegation by @-mention across Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear and email
  • Roughly 3,000 tool integrations plus MCP support for adding your own
  • Priced per organisation at $40 a month rather than per seat
  • SOC 2 Type II and GDPR posture with a public trust portal

Cons

  • No company name, address or country published anywhere on the site
  • Usage is metered in credits, so heavy months cost more than the headline plan
  • Several legal pages return 404 from the footer links

Which one fits

Choose Glean if you need

  • Organisations above roughly 500 people whose knowledge is scattered across a dozen SaaS tools
  • Regulated or security-conscious buyers who need source-system permissions honoured exactly
  • Teams building internal agents that need governed access to company context

Choose Stilla if you need

  • Teams that live in Slack or Teams and will not open another dashboard
  • Product and operations people drowning in status updates and ticket admin
  • Organisations that want one agent reaching many tools rather than one agent per tool

Glean vs Stilla: the questions people ask

Is Glean cheaper than Stilla?

Stilla starts at $40/mo; Glean prices on request, so a quote is the only way to compare.

Does Glean or Stilla have a free tier?

Stilla has a free tier; Glean prices on request.

Which has a public API, Glean or Stilla?

Glean ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Stilla is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

Browse all Personal & Enterprise Search →