Skip to content
effecthub

Glean vs Langdock

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Glean — 90 vs 84 for Langdock
Best fit
Glean: Organisations above roughly 500 people whose knowledge is scattered across a dozen SaaS tools · Langdock: European enterprises that need EU hosting and GDPR posture before rollout
Platforms
Glean: Web, Slack app, Chrome extension · Langdock: Web, iOS, Android
Status
Both up at our last check — Glean Oct 16, 2026, Langdock Oct 15, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactGleanLangdock
CategoryPersonal & Enterprise SearchGeneral-purpose AI Chatbots
Pricing modelContactPaid
Public APIYesYes
Trust score90 / 10084 / 100
PlatformsWeb, API, Slack app, Chrome extensionWeb, iOS, Android, API
CompanyGlean Technologies, Inc.Langdock GmbH
Launched2019—
Last verifiedOct 16, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Glean

Glean is the reference implementation of permission-aware enterprise search, and permissions are the hard part everyone else underestimates. It is also priced so that only companies with a real sprawl problem can justify it.

Pros

  • Permission inheritance from each connected system is done properly, not approximated
  • Answers cite and link the underlying documents rather than paraphrasing them away
  • Connector coverage across the mainstream SaaS estate is broad
  • Commercially solid: about $300M ARR by May 2026 at a $7.2B valuation

Cons

  • No published price anywhere, and contracts start in six figures
  • Value depends entirely on connector coverage of your specific stack
  • Index quality inherits whatever mess exists in the source systems
  • Overlaps increasingly with Microsoft and Google's bundled offerings, which cost nothing extra

Langdock

Langdock sells the thing European enterprises actually need before they can roll out AI: one assistant across the company, hosted in the EU, with admin controls, audit and no single-model lock-in. The customer list (Merck, BASF, Der Spiegel) and the compliance certifications back that up. The pricing is where to look closely — the EUR 25 seat is only the base, and workflows, governance and API tokens are three separate meters on top.

Pros

  • Model-agnostic, so the underlying provider can change without a migration
  • EU hosting with ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliance
  • Cloud or on-premise deployment, plus custom branding
  • Chat, agents, workflows, integrations and API in one platform
  • Web, iOS and Android clients, and a 7-day trial with no card

Cons

  • Four separate meters: seats, workflow runs, governance and API tokens
  • The workflow add-on starts at EUR 539/month, far above the seat price
  • Governance is free only until January 2027, then EUR 3.50 per user per month
  • Priced in euros, so the dollar cost moves with the exchange rate
  • Enterprise pricing above 1,000 users requires a sales conversation

Which one fits

Choose Glean if you need

  • Organisations above roughly 500 people whose knowledge is scattered across a dozen SaaS tools
  • Regulated or security-conscious buyers who need source-system permissions honoured exactly
  • Teams building internal agents that need governed access to company context

Choose Langdock if you need

  • European enterprises that need EU hosting and GDPR posture before rollout
  • Organisations that want to switch underlying models without changing tools
  • IT teams needing admin governance, branding and on-premise options

Glean vs Langdock: the questions people ask

Which has a public API, Glean or Langdock?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

Browse all Personal & Enterprise Search →