Skip to content
effecthub

Gamma vs Shyne

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price
Gamma from $9/mo, Shyne from $16/seat/mo — different billing units, so no direct winner
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Gamma — 90 vs 79 for Shyne
Best fit
Gamma: Anyone who needs a presentable deck out of rough notes in minutes · Shyne: small marketing or creative teams wanting one tool for decks, docs, and social content

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

GammaPrompts become decks, docs and sites you can publishShyneA shared canvas where a team and AI build decks, documents, social posts, and video together.

Side by side

FactGammaShyne
CategoryPresentation & Slide GeneratorsGraphic Design & Templates
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$9/mo$16/seat/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score90 / 10079 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb
CompanyGamma Tech, Inc.Shyne
Launched2020—
Last verifiedOct 23, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Gamma

The tool that genuinely displaced PowerPoint for a lot of people, and it is profitable enough not to need your money - but credits, not seats, decide how much a plan is actually worth.

Pros

  • Layout and image choice happen without picking a template first
  • One document publishes as a deck, a doc or a live web page
  • Plus at $9 per seat per month already removes the Gamma badge
  • Profitable at over $100M ARR, so the vendor is not a runway risk

Cons

  • Credit accounting is opaque - a premium image can cost up to 125 credits
  • API keys are locked to Pro and above
  • The free plan's 400 signup credits do not go far on image-rich decks
  • Export fidelity to PowerPoint degrades on complex layouts

Shyne

Shyne's pitch, a live canvas a team and an AI both work in, rather than a chat window bolted onto a document editor, is a genuine structural difference from most AI writing/design tools, and it inherits real product experience from the same team's earlier NextDocs editor. Per-seat credit pricing means cost scales with team size in a way that's easy to estimate up front. The main open question is output quality across such a wide format range (decks, docs, social, video, sites) versus tools that specialize in just one.

Pros

  • one shared canvas for decks, documents, social posts, images, video, and simple websites
  • content calendar and brand kit built in rather than sold as add-ons
  • free tier includes 1,000 AI credits per seat monthly, enough for a real trial
  • comes from the team behind an existing, supported product (NextDocs)

Cons

  • per-seat pricing on Pro and Ultra can add up quickly for larger teams
  • spreading across six-plus output formats may mean shallower depth in each versus a specialist tool
  • operating company's country isn't disclosed on the site

Which one fits

Choose Gamma if you need

  • Anyone who needs a presentable deck out of rough notes in minutes
  • Teams publishing one-page sites and documents without a website tool
  • Users who want AI layout but expect to keep editing afterwards

Choose Shyne if you need

  • small marketing or creative teams wanting one tool for decks, docs, and social content
  • teams that already used NextDocs and want the same maker's newer product

Gamma vs Shyne: the questions people ask

Is Gamma cheaper than Shyne?

They charge in different units, so there is no like-for-like answer: Gamma starts at $9/mo, Shyne at $16/seat/mo. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it.

Does Gamma or Shyne have a free tier?

Both: Gamma has a free tier, and Shyne has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Gamma or Shyne?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

More comparisons

Browse all Presentation & Slide Generators →