Skip to content
effecthub

Autoppt vs Gamma

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Gamma — $9/mo vs $12.49/mo for Autoppt
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Gamma has one; not confirmed by us for Autoppt
Higher Trust score
Gamma — 90 vs 83 for Autoppt
Best fit
Autoppt: Students and office workers who must hand over an editable PowerPoint file · Gamma: Anyone who needs a presentable deck out of rough notes in minutes

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

AutopptGenerates editable PowerPoint decks from a topic line or an uploaded documentGammaPrompts become decks, docs and sites you can publish

Side by side

FactAutopptGamma
CategoryPresentation & Slide GeneratorsPresentation & Slide Generators
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$12.49/mo$9/mo
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score83 / 10090 / 100
PlatformsWebWeb, API
CompanyAutopptGamma Tech, Inc.
Launched—2020
Last verifiedOct 16, 2026Oct 23, 2026

What our research says

Autoppt

Autoppt is aimed squarely at people who need a real .pptx file rather than a web-only deck, and the ability to change template after generation is a genuinely useful escape hatch. The catch is a free tier so thin, one deck total, that it barely counts as an evaluation.

Pros

  • Exports to PPTX, PDF and images with unlimited downloads on paid plans
  • Template can be swapped after generation without redoing the content
  • Bundled summariser, mind maps and PDF tools on the same subscription
  • Interface localised into more than a dozen languages

Cons

  • Free tier permits a single deck generation
  • No public API, so it cannot be wired into an existing workflow
  • Little disclosed about the company beyond a Chinese registration

Gamma

The tool that genuinely displaced PowerPoint for a lot of people, and it is profitable enough not to need your money - but credits, not seats, decide how much a plan is actually worth.

Pros

  • Layout and image choice happen without picking a template first
  • One document publishes as a deck, a doc or a live web page
  • Plus at $9 per seat per month already removes the Gamma badge
  • Profitable at over $100M ARR, so the vendor is not a runway risk

Cons

  • Credit accounting is opaque - a premium image can cost up to 125 credits
  • API keys are locked to Pro and above
  • The free plan's 400 signup credits do not go far on image-rich decks
  • Export fidelity to PowerPoint degrades on complex layouts

Which one fits

Choose Autoppt if you need

  • Students and office workers who must hand over an editable PowerPoint file
  • Turning an existing report or PDF into slides without retyping it
  • Non-English decks, given the wide interface language coverage

Choose Gamma if you need

  • Anyone who needs a presentable deck out of rough notes in minutes
  • Teams publishing one-page sites and documents without a website tool
  • Users who want AI layout but expect to keep editing afterwards

Autoppt vs Gamma: the questions people ask

Is Autoppt cheaper than Gamma?

On published entry prices, Gamma starts lower — $9/mo against $12.49/mo for Autoppt. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Autoppt or Gamma have a free tier?

Both: Autoppt has a free tier, and Gamma has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Autoppt or Gamma?

Gamma ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Autoppt is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

More comparisons

All Autoppt alternatives →Browse all Presentation & Slide Generators →