Skip to content
effecthub

Gamma vs Pitch

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Both have one
Best fit
Gamma: Anyone who needs a presentable deck out of rough notes in minutes · Pitch: Startups and agencies sharing branded decks and tracking engagement
Platforms
Gamma: Web · Pitch: Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android
Trust score
About even — Gamma 90, Pitch 92

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

GammaPrompts become decks, docs and sites you can publishPitchTeam presentation workspace with AI deck generation, brand controls and engagement analytics on shared links

Side by side

FactGammaPitch
CategoryPresentation & Slide GeneratorsPresentation & Slide Generators
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$9/mo—
Public APIYesYes
Trust score90 / 10092 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, API
CompanyGamma Tech, Inc.Pitch Software GmbH
Launched20202018
Last verifiedOct 23, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Gamma

The tool that genuinely displaced PowerPoint for a lot of people, and it is profitable enough not to need your money - but credits, not seats, decide how much a plan is actually worth.

Pros

  • Layout and image choice happen without picking a template first
  • One document publishes as a deck, a doc or a live web page
  • Plus at $9 per seat per month already removes the Gamma badge
  • Profitable at over $100M ARR, so the vendor is not a runway risk

Cons

  • Credit accounting is opaque - a premium image can cost up to 125 credits
  • API keys are locked to Pro and above
  • The free plan's 400 signup credits do not go far on image-rich decks
  • Export fidelity to PowerPoint degrades on complex layouts

Pitch

One of the more polished collaborative deck tools, with brand governance and link analytics that sales and agency teams actually use. AI is an assistant on a credit meter rather than the core product; a Pitch MCP connector now works on every plan, while API keys for template-driven deck automation sit on Business and Enterprise only.

Pros

  • Strong collaboration, template and brand-kit system
  • Share-link analytics show per-slide engagement
  • Native apps on macOS, Windows, iOS and Android in addition to web
  • Free plan allows unlimited presentations

Cons

  • AI credits cap out per plan, and the free plan's 100 credits never renew
  • Euro-first pricing display makes USD budgeting a currency-rate guess
  • API keys are limited to Business and Enterprise, and the API builds decks from templates rather than with Pitch's AI

Which one fits

Choose Gamma if you need

  • Anyone who needs a presentable deck out of rough notes in minutes
  • Teams publishing one-page sites and documents without a website tool
  • Users who want AI layout but expect to keep editing afterwards

Choose Pitch if you need

  • Startups and agencies sharing branded decks and tracking engagement
  • Teams co-editing presentations across desktop and mobile
  • Sales teams generating personalized deck variants in bulk

Gamma vs Pitch: the questions people ask

Is Gamma cheaper than Pitch?

Gamma starts at $9/mo. Pitch has a free tier; what its paid plans cost is not confirmed by us yet.

Does Gamma or Pitch have a free tier?

Both: Gamma has a free tier, and Pitch has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Gamma or Pitch?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

More comparisons

All Pitch alternatives →Browse all Presentation & Slide Generators →