Skip to content
effecthub

Fathom vs Wudpecker

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Wudpecker — $19/mo vs $20/mo for Fathom
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Fathom has one; not confirmed by us for Wudpecker
Higher Trust score
Fathom — 94 vs 83 for Wudpecker
Best fit
Fathom: Individuals who want unlimited recording and summaries without paying anything · Wudpecker: Sales, research or recruiting teams running the same call format repeatedly

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactFathomWudpecker
CategoryMeeting AssistantsMeeting Assistants
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$20/mo$19/mo
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score94 / 10083 / 100
PlatformsWeb, macOS, APIWeb, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android
CompanyFathom (part of Superhuman)Wudpecker Oy
Launched2020—
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Fathom

Still one of the most generous free notetakers we have looked at: unlimited recordings and transcripts with no paywall on the basics, and the paid tiers stay cheap for small sales teams. Since September 2026 Fathom belongs to Superhuman (the former Grammarly), so buyers signing annual contracts should expect the product to be pulled toward that suite. Teams that need deep revenue analytics are still better served by Gong-class platforms.

Pros

  • Free tier includes unlimited recordings, transcripts and clips, which competitors gate
  • Bot-free capture avoids the awkward third participant in the call
  • Public API and MCP server on paid plans, plus native Claude and ChatGPT integrations
  • Aggressive switching offers: free Business for Gong contract holders, 10 free nonprofit seats

Cons

  • CRM sync is capped at three users per domain on lower tiers
  • Team and Business both require two seats, so a solo user pays the $20 Premium rate
  • Business costs $34 per user on monthly billing, $25 only when paid annually
  • Account-wide Ask Fathom search is still marked beta and has lookback limits by tier

Wudpecker

Counting meetings rather than minutes makes the bill easy to reason about, and template-driven notes beat a generic summary when every call has the same shape. The catch is the ceiling: 100 bot-recorded meetings a month on the top self-serve plan, no published API, and a hard length cap on any single recording.

Pros

  • Notes follow a template you pick, not one fixed summary shape
  • Transcription across dozens of languages with a custom vocabulary list
  • EU company and EU servers, stated plainly on the site
  • Free tier records 10 meetings a month rather than offering a short trial

Cons

  • Bot meetings are capped per month rather than drawn from a minute pool, so a short call costs the same as a long one
  • No documented public API
  • Notion, Slack and HubSpot integrations are paid-tier only

Which one fits

Choose Fathom if you need

  • Individuals who want unlimited recording and summaries without paying anything
  • Small sales teams that need CRM notes written automatically after every call
  • Anyone who wants meeting context piped into ChatGPT or Claude via API/MCP

Choose Wudpecker if you need

  • Sales, research or recruiting teams running the same call format repeatedly
  • Teams that need EU data residency for meeting recordings
  • Anyone who wants notes filed straight into Notion, Slack or HubSpot

Fathom vs Wudpecker: the questions people ask

Is Fathom cheaper than Wudpecker?

On published entry prices, Wudpecker starts lower — $19/mo against $20/mo for Fathom. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Fathom or Wudpecker have a free tier?

Both: Fathom has a free tier, and Wudpecker has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Fathom or Wudpecker?

Fathom ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Wudpecker is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All Fathom alternatives →All Wudpecker alternatives →Browse all Meeting Assistants →

From the blog