Skip to content
effecthub

Bluedot vs Fathom

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Bluedot — $14/mo vs $20/mo for Fathom
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Fathom — 94 vs 73 for Bluedot
Best fit
Bluedot: Sales and recruiting teams that need transcripts pushed into CRM or ATS records · Fathom: Individuals who want unlimited recording and summaries without paying anything

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactBluedotFathom
CategoryMeeting Recording & NotesMeeting Assistants
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$14/mo$20/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score73 / 10094 / 100
PlatformsWeb, Chrome extension, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, APIWeb, macOS, API
Company—Fathom (part of Superhuman)
Launched—2020
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Bluedot

A good pick when you want meeting notes without a visible bot participant joining every call, and its billing only charges people who actually record. The catch is a nearly unusable free tier (five meetings ever) and audio-only capture until you pay for Pro.

Pros

  • Device-level capture means no bot joins the call
  • Apps across Chrome, desktop and mobile plus an API and MCP endpoint for automation
  • Per-recorder billing avoids paying for passive teammates
  • Webhooks and integrations arrive at the $14 Basic tier

Cons

  • Free tier is a 5-meeting lifetime demo, not a plan
  • Video capture and unlimited duration require the $20 Pro tier
  • Cancelling permanently deletes your data after 30 days

Fathom

Still one of the most generous free notetakers we have looked at: unlimited recordings and transcripts with no paywall on the basics, and the paid tiers stay cheap for small sales teams. Since September 2026 Fathom belongs to Superhuman (the former Grammarly), so buyers signing annual contracts should expect the product to be pulled toward that suite. Teams that need deep revenue analytics are still better served by Gong-class platforms.

Pros

  • Free tier includes unlimited recordings, transcripts and clips, which competitors gate
  • Bot-free capture avoids the awkward third participant in the call
  • Public API and MCP server on paid plans, plus native Claude and ChatGPT integrations
  • Aggressive switching offers: free Business for Gong contract holders, 10 free nonprofit seats

Cons

  • CRM sync is capped at three users per domain on lower tiers
  • Team and Business both require two seats, so a solo user pays the $20 Premium rate
  • Business costs $34 per user on monthly billing, $25 only when paid annually
  • Account-wide Ask Fathom search is still marked beta and has lookback limits by tier

Which one fits

Choose Bluedot if you need

  • Sales and recruiting teams that need transcripts pushed into CRM or ATS records
  • Companies whose clients dislike bot participants appearing in meetings
  • Multilingual teams needing transcription across 100+ languages

Choose Fathom if you need

  • Individuals who want unlimited recording and summaries without paying anything
  • Small sales teams that need CRM notes written automatically after every call
  • Anyone who wants meeting context piped into ChatGPT or Claude via API/MCP

Bluedot vs Fathom: the questions people ask

Is Bluedot cheaper than Fathom?

On published entry prices, Bluedot starts lower — $14/mo against $20/mo for Fathom. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Bluedot or Fathom have a free tier?

Both: Bluedot has a free tier, and Fathom has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Bluedot or Fathom?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

All Bluedot alternatives →All Fathom alternatives →Browse all Meeting Recording & Notes →

From the blog