Skip to content
effecthub

CreateDraft vs Spellbook

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
CreateDraft is free to use; Spellbook prices on request
Higher Trust score
Spellbook — 90 vs 69 for CreateDraft
Best fit
CreateDraft: First drafts of routine agreements before legal review · Spellbook: Small and mid-size firms and in-house teams doing high contract volume in Word
Platforms
CreateDraft: Web · Spellbook: Windows, macOS, Web
Status
Both up at our last check — CreateDraft Oct 16, 2026, Spellbook Oct 15, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactCreateDraftSpellbook
CategoryLegal & LegalTechContract Analysis & Review
Pricing modelFreeContact
Trust score69 / 10090 / 100
PlatformsWebWindows, macOS, Web
Company—Spellbook
Launched—2018
Last verifiedOct 16, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

CreateDraft

As a template picker wrapped around OpenAI models, CreateDraft is a faster start than a blank page, and 373 templates against 200-plus jurisdictions is a wide net. The problem is everything around it: no named company, an About page that says coming soon, and no published price for a tool that drafts binding documents. Treat the output as a first draft for a lawyer to mark up.

Pros

  • 373 named templates spanning commercial, employment, property, family and IP documents
  • Jurisdiction and language pickers covering 200-plus countries and roughly 55 languages
  • Draft length is selectable from about 500 to 2,000-plus words
  • Guests get 5,000 words a day with no account and no card

Cons

  • No company, address or jurisdiction of the vendor is published anywhere
  • The About page is literally a coming soon placeholder
  • There is no pricing page, so what unlimited credits costs after signup is unknown
  • Model choice is exposed but there is no clause library, citation or legal source behind the output

Spellbook

Spellbook wins on the thing that decides legal-tech adoption: it lives in Word, where the lawyers already are, instead of asking them to move. The cost of that is a sales process and a price you cannot check before you engage.

Pros

  • Native Word add-in means near-zero behaviour change for the people who have to use it
  • Benchmarks against both market norms and the firm's own precedent, not just generic templates
  • Well capitalised: $50M Series B led by Khosla in October 2025 plus $40M debt in March 2026
  • 7-day free trial is available without going through procurement

Cons

  • No published pricing at any tier, so budgeting requires a sales conversation
  • No API, which blocks integration into an existing contract lifecycle system
  • Priced per seat, so cost scales with headcount rather than contract volume
  • The vendor is now actively acquiring competitors, so the product surface may shift

Which one fits

Choose CreateDraft if you need

  • First drafts of routine agreements before legal review
  • Getting a jurisdiction-specific starting structure quickly
  • Producing the same document in another language

Choose Spellbook if you need

  • Small and mid-size firms and in-house teams doing high contract volume in Word
  • Practices with an existing precedent bank worth benchmarking drafts against
  • Teams that want redlining suggestions in the document rather than in a separate portal

CreateDraft vs Spellbook: the questions people ask

Does CreateDraft or Spellbook have a free tier?

CreateDraft is free to use; Spellbook prices on request.

All CreateDraft alternatives →All Spellbook alternatives →Browse all Legal & LegalTech →