Skip to content
effecthub

Clay vs Kuration

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Cheaper paid plan
Kuration — $49/mo vs $167/mo for Clay
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Both have one
Higher Trust score
Clay — 94 vs 74 for Kuration
Best fit
Clay: Outbound teams that need firmographic, contact and intent data from several vendors in one list · Kuration: Building niche prospect lists based on specific criteria beyond firmographics

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactClayKuration
CategorySales Intelligence & EnrichmentLead Generation & Prospecting
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$167/mo$49/mo
Public APIYesYes
Trust score94 / 10074 / 100
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, API
CompanyClay Labs Inc.Kuration AI
Launched2017—
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Clay

Clay is the tool to reach for when a prospect list needs more than one data vendor and some judgement per row - the waterfall enrichment and the research agent do in one table what used to take three subscriptions and a VA. It is not a cheap or simple tool: the useful plan starts at a few hundred dollars a month, credits are spent per column per row, and CRM sync and webhooks only arrive on the $446 tier. A one-person outbound effort can live on the free plan; a team that already runs sequences will want Growth and a budget for overages.

Pros

  • Waterfall enrichment tries many providers per field, so coverage is higher than any one vendor
  • Claygent runs open web research per row with a prompt, not just database lookups
  • Free plan has unlimited seats and tables, so a team can trial it without buying seats
  • Large integration and template ecosystem, and the company is well funded

Cons

  • Launch at $167 a month still lacks CRM integrations, HTTP API and webhooks - those start at $446
  • Actions and data credits are two separate meters, and the pricing page itself shows two different credit figures for Launch
  • The spreadsheet metaphor hides real complexity; building a reliable table takes learning time
  • Overage billing makes the monthly bill hard to forecast

Kuration

Kuration's pitch is searching live, varied sources, event pages, registries, Maps listings, rather than one static contact database, which can surface prospects that standard sales-intelligence tools miss. Credit-based pricing means cost scales directly with list size, so large campaigns need one of the higher tiers.

Pros

  • Searches 200+ live sources rather than one static database
  • Documented REST API, webhooks, and an MCP server for agent tools
  • Native integrations with major CRMs and outreach platforms

Cons

  • Credit-based pricing scales quickly for large lists
  • Multi-office structure (Hong Kong, New York, Abu Dhabi) means no single clear jurisdiction
  • Free tier capped at 25 rows

Which one fits

Choose Clay if you need

  • Outbound teams that need firmographic, contact and intent data from several vendors in one list
  • GTM engineers automating research and personalisation per account with prompts and agents
  • RevOps groups wiring job-change and funding signals into their CRM

Choose Kuration if you need

  • Building niche prospect lists based on specific criteria beyond firmographics
  • Teams that want CRM and outreach-tool integrations out of the box
  • Developers wanting API or MCP access to prospecting data

Clay vs Kuration: the questions people ask

Is Clay cheaper than Kuration?

On published entry prices, Kuration starts lower — $49/mo against $167/mo for Clay. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it; what each plan includes differs.

Does Clay or Kuration have a free tier?

Both: Clay has a free tier, and Kuration has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Clay or Kuration?

Both ship a public API, so either can be built on; the fact table above shows the platforms each one runs on.

Browse all Sales Intelligence & Enrichment →