Chronicle vs Pitch

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan: Both have one
Public API: Both have one
Higher Trust score: Pitch — 92 vs 84 for Chronicle
Best fit: Chronicle: Consultants and founders turning a memo into a deck · Pitch: Startups and agencies sharing branded decks and tracking engagement
Platforms: Chronicle: Web · Pitch: Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

ChroniclePaste a doc or notes, get an on-brand deck, then edit it by typing instructions instead of dragging shapes.

PitchTeam presentation workspace with AI deck generation, brand controls and engagement analytics on shared links

Side by side

Fact	Chronicle	Pitch
Category	Presentation & Slide Generators	Presentation & Slide Generators
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Starts at	$15/seat/mo	—
Public API	Yes	Yes
Trust score	84 / 100	92 / 100
Platforms	Web, API	Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, API
Company	ChronicleHQ Inc.	Pitch Software GmbH
Launched	—	2018
Last verified	Oct 16, 2026	Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Chronicle

The editing model is what separates this from the pile of deck generators: instead of regenerating a slide you tell it what to change and it changes it, so a generated deck is a starting point rather than a throwaway. Brand themes, PowerPoint export and an API make it usable inside a company rather than only for a one-off pitch. The token allowance per seat is the real meter, and PowerPoint export is gated behind the $30 tier.

Pros

Natural-language editing of existing slides, not just first-pass generation
Exports to PowerPoint and PDF and publishes to the web
Custom brand themes and shared workspaces on paid tiers
Free tier of 10 decks is enough to judge output quality
Documented API for programmatic deck creation

Cons

Priced per seat with a separate monthly token cap that limits generation
PowerPoint export and the Muse agent require the $30 Plus tier
The company publishes no headquarters or registered address

Pitch

One of the more polished collaborative deck tools, with brand governance and link analytics that sales and agency teams actually use. AI is an assistant on a credit meter rather than the core product; a Pitch MCP connector now works on every plan, while API keys for template-driven deck automation sit on Business and Enterprise only.

Pros

Strong collaboration, template and brand-kit system
Share-link analytics show per-slide engagement
Native apps on macOS, Windows, iOS and Android in addition to web
Free plan allows unlimited presentations

Cons

AI credits cap out per plan, and the free plan's 100 credits never renew
Euro-first pricing display makes USD budgeting a currency-rate guess
API keys are limited to Business and Enterprise, and the API builds decks from templates rather than with Pitch's AI

Which one fits

Choose Chronicle if you need

Consultants and founders turning a memo into a deck
Teams that need slides on a locked brand theme
Anyone who wants to publish a deck as a web page as well as a file

Choose Pitch if you need

Startups and agencies sharing branded decks and tracking engagement
Teams co-editing presentations across desktop and mobile
Sales teams generating personalized deck variants in bulk