AirOps vs Writesonic

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Public API: Both have one
Higher Trust score: Writesonic — 93 vs 88 for AirOps
Best fit: AirOps: In-house SEO and content teams whose organic traffic is being eaten by AI answers · Writesonic: Brands that already know they are losing citations inside ChatGPT and want it measured
Status: Both up at our last check — AirOps Oct 16, 2026, Writesonic Oct 15, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

AirOpsTracks brand mentions in AI answers and closes content gaps

WritesonicTracks how brands surface inside ChatGPT, Gemini and AI Overviews

Side by side

Fact	AirOps	Writesonic
Category	AI Visibility & AEO/GEO	Long-form & Blog Content
Pricing model	Contact	Paid
Starts at	—	$79/mo
Public API	Yes	Yes
Trust score	88 / 100	93 / 100
Platforms	Web, API	Web, API
Company	AirOps	Writesonic
Launched	2022	2020
Last verified	Oct 16, 2026	Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

AirOps

Built for content teams with real budget who need both AI-citation measurement and the production capacity to act on it. If you only want to see where you rank in ChatGPT answers, a pure tracking tool costs a fraction of this.

Pros

Measurement and production in one system, so gaps flow straight into briefs and refreshes
Pro tracks 7+ answer engines rather than a single-source view
Genuine API, SDKs and MCP servers make it scriptable instead of UI-only
A 14-day trial without payment details lets you validate the tracking data first

Cons

No public prices on any tier — Solo, Pro and Enterprise all end in a sales-set package
Task-based metering makes cost forecasting hard until you have run a month
No permanent free tier any more, only a 14-day trial
Positioning has shifted repeatedly from AI app builder to marketing workflows to AI search visibility

Writesonic

This is not the AI copywriter the catalogs still describe: it is a GEO tracking suite priced like one, and at $79 a month on annual billing you are paying monitoring money for a three-engine view of your own brand. The free plan that used to soften the entry is gone; what is left is a 7-day trial.

Pros

Daily prompt and answer tracking is the core of the product, not a bolt-on dashboard
Site audits, content generation and the Action Center sit in the same tool as the monitoring
7-day trial with full access and no card, plus a 7-day refund window after paying

Cons

Self-serve plans watch three engines out of nine; Perplexity, Claude and Copilot are Enterprise-only
Month-to-month costs 25% more than the advertised annual rate ($99 against $79 on Starter)
No permanent free plan is listed any more, only a one-week trial
Prompt and article caps reset monthly, so a burst of work stalls until the counter resets

Which one fits

Choose AirOps if you need

In-house SEO and content teams whose organic traffic is being eaten by AI answers
Agencies running programmatic content at scale across many client sites
Engineering-adjacent marketers who will actually use the workflow API rather than the UI

Choose Writesonic if you need

Brands that already know they are losing citations inside ChatGPT and want it measured
Agencies reporting AI-answer share of voice to clients month over month
Teams that want prompt tracking and article production billed on one invoice