Elicit
71Literature review workflow that extracts data into tables
3 products our research names as a replacement for Undermind in Academic Search & Literature Review, each with what it does differently — prices, API and status from our own checks rather than from the vendors’ own pages.
Literature review workflow that extracts data into tables
has a public API
Undermind vs Elicit →Search over peer-reviewed papers with claim summaries
has a public API
Undermind vs Consensus →Free search across 238M research papers, with citation context, one-line summaries and an open scholarly API.
has a public API
Undermind vs Semantic Scholar →Not named as direct replacements — neighbours from the same part of the catalog: the best-rated first, then a sample of the rest.
Search engine for experimental protocols that compares methods across 40M+ papers and patents and scores how reproducible they are.
Workspace for academic papers that combines literature search, outlining, citation-backed writing, and compliance checks.
Lets researchers search and discuss arXiv papers, with answers grounded in the paper text rather than free-form summaries.
Answers and review papers built from cited scientific literature
Lets research teams semantically search over 100 million papers and visualize how they relate to each other.
A life-sciences research assistant that searches 40M+ biomedical papers and returns cited, mechanism-level answers.
Literature search, reference manager, extraction tables and systematic review with PRISMA screening in one tool.
Research assistant that answers from your own paper library with citations pinned to the passage.
Research workspace that searches, explains and compares academic papers and drafts the write-up with citations
Research assistant that answers from 230M papers with citations, maps citation networks and chats across up to 4,000 PDFs.
Searches Google Scholar, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar at once and drafts a literature review grounded in the papers it finds.
Academic research agent that searches PubMed, arXiv, and Scholar, then drafts cited papers up to 50,000 words.
Not what you were after? Browse all Academic Search & Literature Review →