Traycer
Verified Oct 2, 2026 ActiveWorkspace that plans coding tasks and keeps your own AI coding agents on track across editors, devices and teammates.
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Freemium
- Paid options from
- $16/seat/mo
- Billing
- Per seat, monthly
Free for individuals with unlimited agent sessions when you bring your own coding agent. Sync is $16 per user per month billed yearly, adding cloud sync and team features. Traycer Credits for running models through the service and cloud sandboxes are extra and billed by use.
Use tool ↗About Traycer
Traycer sits above the coding agents you already use, such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor or OpenCode, and handles planning, task tracking and agent-to-agent communication. It runs as a VS Code extension and as desktop apps for macOS, Windows and Linux, with a phone app (iPhone in TestFlight beta, Android on Google Play) and remote hosts. The free tier needs no token metering because you bring your own agent; a paid Sync plan adds cloud sync, device switching and team collaboration. Running models through Traycer itself is billed separately in pay-as-you-go credits, and cloud sandboxes cost extra.
- API
- No
- Last verified
- Oct 2, 2026
Verified sources
- Pricing page: Free for individuals, Sync $16 per user per month billed yearly, pay-as-you-go Traycer Credits and cloud sandboxestraycer.ai ↗
- Home page: workspace for coordinating coding agents; VS Code, desktop and mobile apps; SOC 2 Type II and GDPRtraycer.ai ↗
- Download page: Mac, Windows and Linux builds; iPhone via TestFlight beta, Android via Google Playtraycer.ai ↗
- GitHub repository traycerai/traycer under the MIT licencegithub.com ↗
Is Traycer legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- Last checked
- Oct 2, 2026The site answered
- Operated by
- Traycer, United StatesOur research, card verified Oct 2, 2026
Pros & cons of Traycer
Traycer is useful if you already pay for one or more coding agents and want a layer that plans work and keeps context across sessions and teammates. The free tier is generous because it does not resell inference. If you want a single all-in-one editor with its own model, it is the wrong shape.
Pros
- Works with agents you already have instead of locking you to one model
- Free plan has no token metering or inference credits
- Covers editor, desktop and phone, plus remote hosts, with an MIT-licensed public repository
- SOC 2 Type II and GDPR compliance are stated on the site
Cons
- Team features, cloud sync and device switching need the paid Sync plan
- Model usage through Traycer and cloud sandboxes are billed on top
- The product's focus has shifted from a planner to an orchestration workspace, so older tutorials may not match
- The iPhone app is still a TestFlight beta
Best for
- Developers juggling several coding agents who want shared plans and context
- Small teams that need cloud sync of agent sessions and artifacts
Not for
- People who do not already use a coding agent and want one product that includes the model
- Teams that need an offline-only setup with no cloud components
Watch out: The $16 Sync price is per user per month billed yearly, and Traycer Credits and cloud sandboxes are extra usage-based charges, so a team's real bill depends on how much model usage runs through the service.
Top alternatives to Traycer
Amazon Q Developer69AWS's coding and operations assistant for IDEs, the terminal and the console, with its IDE plugins now on an end-of-support clock.Not rated yetFrom $19/seat/moTraycer head-to-head
Side-by-side fact sheets against the competitors our research or their makers name — pricing, platforms, API and both verdicts on one page.
Also used for
AI tools by profession
AI Coding Assistants is one of the jobs on this page: