Skip to content
effecthub

Relevance AI vs Shogo AI

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors. Shogo AI publishes a starting price ($8); Relevance AI does not. Both have a free tier. Only Relevance AI ships a public API.

Relevance AIBuilds and runs a workforce of custom agentsShogo AILets non-developers describe a business process in plain English and get a working AI agent that runs it, connected to 1000+ tools.

Side by side

FactRelevance AIShogo AI
CategoryAI Agents & Autonomous WorkersAI Agents & Autonomous Workers
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at—$8 month
Public APIYesNo
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb
CompanyOnSearch Pty LtdShogo AI
Launched2020—
Last verifiedSep 6, 2026Sep 1, 2026

What our research says

Relevance AI

A credible no-code agent builder, but pricing has moved behind a sales conversation and the two-meter billing makes running cost genuinely hard to forecast.

Pros

  • Agents get tools, knowledge and schedules without any code
  • Free tier of 200 actions a month is enough to prototype something real
  • Model cost is passed through without markup on vendor credits
  • Agents can be grouped into teams that hand work between each other

Cons

  • Self-serve prices are no longer published anywhere on the site
  • Two simultaneous meters make budgeting awkward and surprises likely
  • Top-up rates are steep at $80 per 1,000 actions
  • Smaller vendor than the incumbents it is competing against

Shogo AI

Shogo aims to replace narrow SaaS subscriptions with agents you describe into existence, backed by founders who previously shipped an enterprise agent platform. The pitch spans sales, support, marketing, and HR, which means depth in any one function is unproven without hands-on testing.

Pros

  • Connects to over 1,000 external tools including Slack, GitHub, and Stripe out of the box
  • Free tier lets you try the agent-building flow before paying
  • Founders have prior experience building an enterprise agent product
  • Fixed-price packages exist for teams that want a set scope instead of open-ended usage

Cons

  • Broad claims across sales, support, marketing, and HR make it hard to judge depth in any one area from the site alone
  • No independent reviews yet to confirm reliability at scale
  • Per-seat pricing on top tiers can add up for larger teams

Which one fits

Choose Relevance AI if you need

  • Ops and go-to-market teams automating repetitive research or outreach
  • Companies that want working agents without hiring engineers to build them
  • Workloads where per-task cost matters more than per-seat cost

Choose Shogo AI if you need

  • Startup founders who want a first version of a support or sales workflow without hiring engineers
  • Teams already comfortable handing repetitive tasks to an autonomous agent

More comparisons

Browse all AI Agents & Autonomous Workers →