Skip to content
effecthub

Otter.ai vs Supernormal

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price
Otter.ai from $8.33/seat/mo, Supernormal from $20/mo — different billing units, so no direct winner
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Otter.ai has one; not confirmed by us for Supernormal
Higher Trust score
Otter.ai — 94 vs 79 for Supernormal
Best fit
Otter.ai: Teams that live in Zoom, Meet or Teams and want notes without a note-taker · Supernormal: Professionals who dislike bots joining their calls

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactOtter.aiSupernormal
CategoryMeeting AssistantsMeeting Assistants
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$8.33/seat/mo$20/mo
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score94 / 10079 / 100
PlatformsWeb, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, APImacOS, Windows
CompanyOtter.aiSupernormal
Launched2016—
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 29, 2026

What our research says

Otter.ai

Still the default for English-language meeting notes, and the free tier is unusually usable. What determines the right plan is not features but the per-conversation ceiling: 30 minutes on Basic and 90 on Pro means a standard hour-long review truncates on the free tier and a workshop truncates on Pro. Pick the tier by your longest recurring meeting.

Pros

  • 300 free minutes a month makes evaluation real rather than token
  • Annual Pro at $8.33 is roughly half the month-to-month rate
  • An MCP server is exposed from the free tier, so assistants can query transcripts without the paid API
  • Business removes the minute cap entirely rather than raising it

Cons

  • The API and webhooks require Enterprise, which is quote-only
  • Per-conversation ceilings (30 min free, 90 min Pro) cut recordings mid-meeting
  • Basic allows three file imports in total, not per month
  • Month-to-month pricing is roughly double annual at both self-serve tiers

Supernormal

Supernormal now suits people who want meeting notes without a visible bot and like the idea of an agent drafting the deck or sheet that follows the call. Teams that relied on its old bot, recordings or CRM and project-tool integrations lost them in 2026, and should compare Otter, Fireflies or Fathom first.

Pros

  • Desktop capture means no bot in the meeting
  • Agents act on follow-ups instead of just listing them
  • Unlimited seats on paid plans, sharing one credit pool
  • Notes private by default; MCP server for other tools

Cons

  • Recording and native integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot, Asana, Zapier and others) were retired in March 2026
  • Only 50 credits a month on paid plans, with the cost per task unpublished
  • Capture is limited to six languages

Which one fits

Choose Otter.ai if you need

  • Teams that live in Zoom, Meet or Teams and want notes without a note-taker
  • Accessibility use, where live captions matter as much as the transcript
  • Recruiters and researchers who need searchable interview records across a workspace

Choose Supernormal if you need

  • Professionals who dislike bots joining their calls
  • Small teams that want follow-up documents drafted from meetings
  • Users who meet in one of the six supported languages

Otter.ai vs Supernormal: the questions people ask

Is Otter.ai cheaper than Supernormal?

They charge in different units, so there is no like-for-like answer: Otter.ai starts at $8.33/seat/mo, Supernormal at $20/mo. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it.

Does Otter.ai or Supernormal have a free tier?

Both: Otter.ai has a free tier, and Supernormal has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Otter.ai or Supernormal?

Otter.ai ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Supernormal is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All Otter.ai alternatives →All Supernormal alternatives →Browse all Meeting Assistants →

From the blog