Skip to content
effecthub

Otter.ai vs Shadow

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Entry price
Otter.ai from $8.33/seat/mo, Shadow from $8/mo — different billing units, so no direct winner
Free plan
Both have one
Public API
Otter.ai has one; not confirmed by us for Shadow
Higher Trust score
Otter.ai — 94 vs 81 for Shadow
Best fit
Otter.ai: Teams that live in Zoom, Meet or Teams and want notes without a note-taker · Shadow: Mac users wanting meeting notes without a visible bot joining the call

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

Side by side

FactOtter.aiShadow
CategoryMeeting AssistantsMeeting Assistants
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starts at$8.33/seat/mo$8/mo
Public APIYesNot confirmed
Trust score94 / 10081 / 100
PlatformsWeb, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, APImacOS
CompanyOtter.aiTaper Labs, Inc.
Launched2016—
Last verifiedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026

What our research says

Otter.ai

Still the default for English-language meeting notes, and the free tier is unusually usable. What determines the right plan is not features but the per-conversation ceiling: 30 minutes on Basic and 90 on Pro means a standard hour-long review truncates on the free tier and a workshop truncates on Pro. Pick the tier by your longest recurring meeting.

Pros

  • 300 free minutes a month makes evaluation real rather than token
  • Annual Pro at $8.33 is roughly half the month-to-month rate
  • An MCP server is exposed from the free tier, so assistants can query transcripts without the paid API
  • Business removes the minute cap entirely rather than raising it

Cons

  • The API and webhooks require Enterprise, which is quote-only
  • Per-conversation ceilings (30 min free, 90 min Pro) cut recordings mid-meeting
  • Basic allows three file imports in total, not per month
  • Month-to-month pricing is roughly double annual at both self-serve tiers

Shadow

Shadow's bot-free recording and on-device transcription solve two real complaints about meeting-notetaker tools: awkward bot participants and audio leaving your machine. Skills give it more range than a plain transcription tool, but the whole product is Mac-only, so it's not an option for Windows-based teams.

Pros

  • Free tier includes unlimited transcription and recording, not just a trial
  • No bot joins the call, capture happens locally on the Mac
  • Custom Skills extend beyond notes into emails and structured summaries
  • On-device processing keeps audio off external servers

Cons

  • Mac only, no Windows or Linux client
  • Not joining as a visible bot could raise meeting-recording consent questions depending on jurisdiction

Which one fits

Choose Otter.ai if you need

  • Teams that live in Zoom, Meet or Teams and want notes without a note-taker
  • Accessibility use, where live captions matter as much as the transcript
  • Recruiters and researchers who need searchable interview records across a workspace

Choose Shadow if you need

  • Mac users wanting meeting notes without a visible bot joining the call
  • Privacy-conscious teams wanting on-device transcription
  • Sales teams wanting BANT or similar structured meeting breakdowns automatically

Otter.ai vs Shadow: the questions people ask

Is Otter.ai cheaper than Shadow?

They charge in different units, so there is no like-for-like answer: Otter.ai starts at $8.33/seat/mo, Shadow at $8/mo. Entry price is the lowest paid plan as we last verified it.

Does Otter.ai or Shadow have a free tier?

Both: Otter.ai has a free tier, and Shadow has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Otter.ai or Shadow?

Otter.ai ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Shadow is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

All Otter.ai alternatives →All Shadow alternatives →Browse all Meeting Assistants →

From the blog