OnDemand vs Relevance AI

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Public API: Both have one
Higher Trust score: Relevance AI — 96 vs 82 for OnDemand
Best fit: OnDemand: Development teams wanting a managed layer for building AI agents · Relevance AI: Ops and go-to-market teams automating repetitive research or outreach
Platforms: OnDemand: Web, iOS, Android · Relevance AI: Web
Status: Both up at our last check — OnDemand Oct 15, 2026, Relevance AI Sep 6, 2026

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

OnDemandAgent-building platform with a playground, visual workflow builder, agent marketplace and bring-your-own-model support, on web and mobile.

Relevance AIBuilds and runs a workforce of custom agents for sales, support and back-office work without code.

Side by side

Fact	OnDemand	Relevance AI
Category	LLM Orchestration Frameworks	AI Agents & Autonomous Workers
Pricing model	Contact	Paid
Starts at	—	$19/mo
Public API	Yes	Yes
Trust score	82 / 100	96 / 100
Platforms	Web, API, iOS, Android	Web, API
Company	AIREV Holding Limited	OnSearch Pty Ltd
Launched	2024	2020
Last verified	Oct 15, 2026	Sep 6, 2026

What our research says

OnDemand

OnDemand is a genuine infrastructure play, backed by Core42 and running since mid-2024, aimed at teams that want to compose AI agents from a model and agent marketplace instead of building agent infrastructure from scratch. The lack of any public pricing page is the main practical obstacle to evaluating it without signing up or talking to sales.

Pros

Backed by an established regional AI infrastructure group (Core42/G42)
Supports hosted, proprietary and bring-your-own models and private inference
Agent marketplace, visual flow builder and MCP tool connections in one workspace
Identifiable operator registered in Dubai, plus companion mobile apps

Cons

No public pricing page; plans appear only after sign-in
The public site is a script-rendered app, so feature details are hard to check without an account
Broad 'agent operating system' scope means a long evaluation for a simple use case

Relevance AI

A credible no-code agent builder with a wide library of ready-made sales and ops agents, but the free tier is gone and the self-serve prices live on a docs page while the marketing site pushes everyone to a sales call. The two-meter billing — Actions plus pass-through Vendor Credits — makes running cost hard to forecast, and the $19 annual Pro plan only covers one project and two builders.

Pros

Agents get tools, knowledge and schedules without any code
Large library of pre-built agents for sales, support, HR and ops that can be customised
Model cost is passed through on vendor credits rather than marked up
Agents can be grouped into teams that hand work between each other

Cons

No free plan any more, only paid Pro and Team or an Enterprise quote
Two simultaneous meters make budgeting awkward and surprises likely
Top-up rates are steep at $80 per 1,000 actions
Pro is limited to one project and two build users, so a second workspace means the $349 Team plan

Which one fits

Choose OnDemand if you need

Development teams wanting a managed layer for building AI agents
Companies wanting bring-your-own-model flexibility with hosted infrastructure
Teams that want marketplace extensibility instead of custom integration work

Choose Relevance AI if you need

Ops and go-to-market teams automating repetitive research or outreach
Companies that want working agents without hiring engineers to build them
Workloads where per-task cost matters more than per-seat cost