Skip to content
effecthub

Modyak vs OpenRouter

Two fact sheets from our own research, side by side — pricing, platforms, API access and status re-checked by us rather than quoted from the vendors.

The short answer

Free plan
Both — Modyak is free to use, OpenRouter has a free plan
Public API
OpenRouter has one; not confirmed by us for Modyak
Higher Trust score
OpenRouter — 87 vs 73 for Modyak
Best fit
Modyak: Developers who like the Claude Code interface but want a cheaper or local model · OpenRouter: Developers comparing or switching between many models from one codebase
Platforms
Modyak: macOS · OpenRouter: Web

From our own records as of each tool's last check. Anything we have not confirmed is left out rather than guessed. How we verify

ModyakA free macOS menu-bar app that reroutes Claude Code and Claude Desktop to run on a different AI model provider.OpenRouterSingle OpenAI-compatible API and credit balance for 500+ models from 80+ providers, with fallbacks and routing rules.

Side by side

FactModyakOpenRouter
CategoryAI Gateways & RoutingAI Gateways & Routing
Pricing modelFreeFreemium
Public APINot confirmedYes
Trust score73 / 10087 / 100
PlatformsmacOSWeb, API
CompanyBrthrs Agency BVOpenRouter, Inc.
Launched—2023
Last verifiedSep 1, 2026Oct 2, 2026

What our research says

Modyak

Modyak solves a specific, real annoyance, wanting to use Claude Code's interface without being locked to Anthropic's models, with a lightweight menu-bar app instead of a config file you edit by hand. It's macOS-only and narrowly scoped to routing, so it won't help teams on other operating systems or those wanting a hosted gateway they don't have to run locally.

Pros

  • Free to use, with cost depending only on the provider chosen
  • One-click presets instead of manually editing routing config files
  • Supports a wide range of providers, including fully local, offline inference through Ollama
  • Translates streaming and tool/function calling between provider formats

Cons

  • macOS only, with no Windows or Linux version
  • No web interface, so it only helps with local, single-machine setups
  • As a small independent project, long-term maintenance and updates aren't guaranteed

OpenRouter

OpenRouter is the practical default for developers who want to try or mix many models without opening an account with every lab, and who value automatic fallback when a provider goes down. High-volume teams already on direct contracts with one or two labs will mostly be paying the platform fee for convenience they do not need.

Pros

  • 500+ models behind one OpenAI-compatible API
  • Automatic fallback across providers and routing by price or latency
  • Data-policy routing to keep prompts away from providers you do not trust
  • Free tier with 25+ free models for experimenting

Cons

  • Platform fee of 5.5 to 8% on top of model prices
  • Free tier is limited to 50 requests per day
  • Adds another party between your app and the model provider

Which one fits

Choose Modyak if you need

  • Developers who like the Claude Code interface but want a cheaper or local model
  • EU-based teams needing data residency that a US-hosted default provider doesn't guarantee
  • Anyone wanting a fully offline setup through Ollama

Choose OpenRouter if you need

  • Developers comparing or switching between many models from one codebase
  • Apps that need provider fallback for uptime
  • Small teams that want one bill instead of a dozen provider accounts

Modyak vs OpenRouter: the questions people ask

Does Modyak or OpenRouter have a free tier?

Both: Modyak is free to use, and OpenRouter has a free tier.

Which has a public API, Modyak or OpenRouter?

OpenRouter ships a public API, as of our last verification. A public API for Modyak is not confirmed by us — check its developer docs before you plan an integration.

More comparisons

Browse all AI Gateways & Routing →