Dromeas
Verified Oct 15, 2026 ActiveRuns AI code review on every pull request and trunk commit, then automates the release management around it.
Listed on EffectHub ·
Pricing
- Pricing model
- Freemium
- Paid options from
- $25/mo
- Billing
- Monthly
Free plan gives 50 credits a month on one public repository with no card; Pro is credit packs from 100 credits for $25/month ($0.25 per credit), and Enterprise starts at 2,000 credits a month. No per-seat pricing.
Use tool ↗About Dromeas
Dromeas runs automated code review on every pull request and trunk commit, checking quality, security, compliance, tests, and documentation using multiple AI models working together rather than a single reviewer model. It also handles release management once changes are approved. It connects to GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket Cloud, and exposes a Model Context Protocol server so it can be called from IDEs and AI assistants directly. Pricing runs on a credit system rather than per-seat licensing; the harvested link (orchestrai.dev) now redirects to the current domain.
- Platforms
- Web · API
- API
- Yes
- Last verified
- Oct 15, 2026
Verified sources
- Pricing fact sheet: Free 50 credits/month on 1 public repo, Pro credit packs from 100 credits for $25/month, Enterprise from 2,000 credits; no per-seat pricing (15 October 2026)dromeas.ai ↗
- Site fact sheet (last updated 2026-10-14): reviews PRs, trunk pushes and release diffs; GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket; GitHub Actions, GitLab CI and Jenkins; MCP server for IDEs and coding agents (15 October 2026)dromeas.ai ↗
Is Dromeas legit?
We don’t label tools safe or unsafe. Below are the records we checked ourselves, each with the date we read it.
- Domain registered
- May 20, 2026Registry record (RDAP), registrar NameCheap, Inc., looked up Sep 21, 2026
- TLS certificate
- Issued by Google Trust Services, valid until Dec 14, 2026Seen in our own connection to the site on Oct 15, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 15, 2026The site answered
Pros & cons of Dromeas
Positions itself against a single-model code reviewer by running several AI models together across quality, security, compliance and docs, then extending into release management rather than stopping at the review comment. The MCP server is a real, checkable differentiator for teams already working inside MCP-connected AI assistants. Who runs the company could not be confirmed from the site itself.
Pros
- reviews every PR and trunk commit automatically, not just on request
- uses multiple AI models together rather than a single reviewer
- MCP server works directly inside common AI-assisted IDEs
Cons
- credit-based pricing makes cost harder to predict than flat per-seat plans
- company and founding details are not disclosed on the site
- private-repo support requires the paid tier, since the free tier is public-repo only
Best for
- teams wanting automated review on every PR and trunk commit, not just on demand
- engineering orgs already using MCP-connected AI assistants in their IDE
- teams who want release management bundled with code review rather than as a separate tool
Not for
- solo developers who only need occasional AI review, not continuous coverage
- teams wanting flat per-seat pricing instead of a credit system
Watch out: The product previously lived at a different domain (orchestrai.dev), which now redirects to dromeas.ai - worth confirming you're on the current domain before entering any credentials.
Alternatives to Dromeas
Dromeas head-to-head
Side-by-side fact sheets against the competitors our research or their makers name — pricing, platforms, API and both verdicts on one page.
AI tools by profession
Code Review & Quality is one of the jobs on this page: